Comparative Analysis Of Biodiversity Conservation Outcomes In Mpas Versus Non-Protected Marine Areas

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are universally accepted as fundamental instruments for the protection of marine biodiversity, but their effectiveness is different in ecological and management contexts. This research compares the ecological effects of MPAs to non-protected areas of the sea across various tropical ecoregions. The main objective is to test whether MPAs have greater biodiversity and ecosystem function than ecologically comparable non-MPA sites. This study also explores the extent to which MPA characteristics such as age, protection, and level of enforcement affect conservation effectiveness. Field data were obtained from 16 reef locations (eight MPAs and eight paired non-MPAs) in the Coral Triangle, Western Indian Ocean, Tropical Eastern Pacific, and Caribbean Basin. Underwater visual census, environmental Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) sampling, and remote sensing provided measurements of species richness, fish biomass, trophic composition, coral cover, and functional diversity. Statistical analysis involved Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA), Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS), and generalized linear mixed models. MPAs always maintained greater biodiversity, with average species richness and fish biomass that were significantly greater than those from non-MPAs. Functional richness and dispersion were also greater in MPAs, suggesting greater ecological functions and resilience. Older strictly protected MPAs showed the most robust conservation benefits, whereas partially protected or younger MPAs showed limited gains. MPAs increase biodiversity and ecosystem organization when properly managed. Effectiveness is time since establishment and enforcement quality dependent. These results affirm the necessity of science-informed MPA expansion policies that focus on governance capacity and ecological surveillance.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  International Journal of Environmental Science

• Publication date

  2025-07-17

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.64252/bena1s31
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Ocean protection quality is lagging behind quantity: Applying a scientific framework to assess real marine protected area progress against the 30 by 30 target

  2024cited by this paper
• Marine protected areas are a useful tool to protect coral reef fishes but not representative to conserve their functional role.

  2023cited by this paper
• Diversity in marine protected area regulations: Protection approaches for locally appropriate marine management

  2023cited by this paper
• External fishing effort regulates positive effects of no-take marine protected areas

  2022cited by this paper
• Greater resilience of reef fish assemblages in a no-take reserve compared to multi-use areas of the Gulf of California

  2022cited by this paper
• Trends and Evolution in the Concept of Marine Ecosystem Services: An Overview

  2021cited by this paper
• Mesophotic Ecosystems: The Link between Shallow and Deep-Sea Habitats

  2020cited by this paper
• Can marine reserves restore lost ecosystem functioning? A global synthesis.

  2019cited by this paper
• Marine protected areas enhance coral reef functioning by promoting fish biodiversity

  2019cited by this paper
• No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean

  2018cited by this paper
• Your evidence or mine? Systematic evaluation of reviews of marine protected area effectiveness

  2017cited by this paper
• Deep thinking: a systematic review of mesophotic coral ecosystems

  2017cited by this paper
• Evaluating the success of a marine protected area: A systematic review approach.

  2016cited by this paper
• Pathways from marine protected area design and management to ecological success

  2015cited by this paper
• Using community‐level metrics to monitor the effects of marine protected areas on biodiversity

  2015cited by this paper
• Governing marine protected areas in an interconnected and changing world

  2015cited by this paper
• Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features

  2014cited by this paper
• Valuing and Evaluating Marine Ecosystem Services: Putting the Right Price on Marine Environments?

  2014cited by this paper
• Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas

  2013cited by this paper
• Reexamining the science of marine protected areas: linking knowledge to action

  2012cited by this paper
• Marine Protected Areas and the Governance of Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries

  2011cited by this paper
• Resilience, Robustness, and Marine Ecosystem-based Management

  2008cited by this paper
• Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services

  2006cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.