Examining Views about Academic Freedom at Institutions of Higher Education in the US

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Innovative Higher Education

• Publication date

  2025-09-10

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10755-025-09845-6
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Examining Subjectivity with Q Methodology

  2025cited by this paper
• Meritocracy seen through the eyes of its champions: a comparative study of educational elites

  2024cited by this paper
• Knowledge production at a crossroads: rising antidemocracy and diminishing academic freedom

  2024cited by this paper
• The tyranny of meritocracy and elite higher education

  2022cited by this paper
• United States accreditation in higher education: does it dilute academic freedom?

  2022cited by this paper
• The Coronavirus and Higher Education: Faculty Viewpoints about Universities Moving Online during a Worldwide Pandemic

  2021cited by this paper
• Academic freedom and the fallacy of a post-truth era

  2021cited by this paper
• Academic freedom of students

  2020cited by this paper
• KADE: A desktop application for Q methodology

  2019cited by this paper
• Free speech on US university campuses: differentiating perspectives using Q methodology

  2018cited by this paper
• Free Speech on Campus

  2017cited by this paper
• Academic Freedom and the Critical Task of the University

  2017cited by this paper
• Re-framing student academic freedom: a capability perspective

  2012cited by this paper
• Q Methodology and Its Position in the Mixed-Methods Continuum

  2011cited by this paper
• Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education

  2011cited by this paper
• A Match Made in Heaven: A Marginalized Methodology for Studying the Marginalized

  2006cited by this paper
• Technical Research Note: Loss of Meaning in Likert Scaling: A Note on the Q Methodological Alternative

  2001cited by this paper
• Q methodology.

  1997cited by this paper
• The Issue of Generalization in Q Methodology: "Reliable Schematics" Revisited

  1992cited by this paper

• Reconsidering Innovation in Higher Education: Co-construction of a Concept

  2026cites this paper
• Understanding Subjective Views on the Perceived Motivations for Spreading Hoaxes Via a Rigorous Q Sample Framework: Addressing Core Methodological Questions

  2025cites this paper