Computing education’s superbug: interrogating the computer-mind metaphors

In one of the significant results from early computing education research, Pea identifies a computer-as-mind metaphor that novices use in ascribing mental properties of personhood to the computer, which causes students considerable conceptual confusion. In characterizing this as students’ superbug, Pea uses a mind-as-computer metaphor, the converse metaphor to the one that students use. In doing so, he makes visible a metaphor that has become one of the predominant metaphors of mind in mid- to late-20th century theorizing in psychology and the cognitive sciences. I take both of these metaphors (computer-as-mind and mind-as-computer) to be the superbug that plagues not only student attempts to program but also computing education more broadly. The purpose of this paper is to argue that these computer-mind metaphors are a steady undercurrent that runs from the cognitive sciences through computing education and the research on it, what is problematic about these metaphors, what causes this metaphorical affliction, why we might want to cure ourselves from it, and how we can do so. Key to this cure is to counter disembodied views of human reasoning and action, epitomized in first generation cognitive science, with embodied and enactive theoretical perspectives, epitomized in second generation cognitive science and in multimodal and embodied approaches to the social sciences.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  ACM Transactions on Computing Education

• Publication date

  2025-09-29

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1145/3769856
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Embodied experiences: Critical insights from Dewey for contemporary education

  2020cited by this paper
• Pragmatism, Objectivity, and Experience

  2019influential reference
• Engaging with Buddhism

  2018cited by this paper
• Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking

  2017cited by this paper
• Computational thinking for teacher education

  2017cited by this paper
• John Dewey’s Radical Logic: The Function of the Qualitative in Thinking

  2016cited by this paper
• HEGEL, DEWEY, AND HABITS1

  2015cited by this paper
• A Natural History of Human Thinking

  2014cited by this paper
• Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods.

  2011cited by this paper
• Machines for Thinking

  2010cited by this paper
• Scratching the surface of advanced topics in software engineering: a workshop module for middle school students

  2008cited by this paper
• Computational thinking

  2006cited by this paper
• Mind incarnate: from Dewey to Damasio

  2006influential reference
• The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective.

  2003cited by this paper
• Psychology, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science: Reflections on the History and Philosophy of Experimental Psychology

  2002cited by this paper
• The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory

  2001cited by this paper
• Learning the lessons.

  1996cited by this paper
• Mind as computer: Birth of a metaphor

  1996cited by this paper
• Enlightenment Calculations

  1994influential reference
• Discovery in Cognitive Psychology: New Tools Inspire New Theories

  1992cited by this paper
• From Tools to Theories: A Heuristic of Discovery in Cognitive Psychology.

  1991cited by this paper
• Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity

  1990cited by this paper
• Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs

  1987cited by this paper
• Language-Independent Conceptual “Bugs” in Novice Programming

  1986cited by this paper
• The Matter of Habit

  1986cited by this paper
• The Evolution of Mental Metaphors in Psychology. A 90-Year Retrospective

  1985cited by this paper
• Descartes, Peirce and the Cognitive Community

  1982cited by this paper
• Metaphors We Live by

  1982influential reference
• Plans and the Structure of Behavior

  1968influential reference
• Essays in the experimental logic

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.