Support for liberal democracy in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Support for fundamental political rights is a defining feature of liberal democracy. Crises may undermine citizen support for these rights. Yet, existing research does not often distinguish support for ‘illiberal’ policies that encroach on fundamental political rights from other ‘intrusive’ crisis policy responses. By conducting a series of well-powered, preregistered conjoint and vignette experiments in the and the UK during the height of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, we examine the extent to which citizens are willing to support policies that violate liberal democratic rights in a crisis as well as intrusive policies. Our results suggest that support for liberal democratic rights is quite robust, although endorsements by an in-group party or trusted expert can increase support for illiberal policies. Overall, we find noteworthy resistance to illiberal policy measures, such as postponing elections and banning protests, indicating popular commitment to liberal democratic norms.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  European Journal of Political Research

• Publication date

  2025-09-30

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/s1475676525100145
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Elite Cues and Noncompliance

  2024cited by this paper
• Young People Punish Undemocratic Behaviour Less Than Older People

  2023cited by this paper
• Democracy erodes from the top: Leaders, citizens, and the challenge of populism in Europe

  2023cited by this paper
• Partisans’ receptivity to persuasive messaging is undiminished by countervailing party leader cues

  2023cited by this paper
• Nathan P. Kalmoe and Lilliana Mason. Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy

  2023cited by this paper
• Subjective and Objective Measurement of Democratic Backsliding

  2023cited by this paper
• Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics

  2023cited by this paper
• Emotions, Governmental Trust, and Support for the Restriction of Civil Liberties during the Covid‐19 Pandemic

  2022cited by this paper
• Does Competence Make Citizens Tolerate Undemocratic Behavior?

  2022influential reference
• Citizenship in Hard Times

  2022cited by this paper
• Citizenship in Hard Times: How Ordinary People Respond to Democratic Threat. By Sara Wallace Goodman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper.

  2022cited by this paper
• Rationalizing Democracy: The Perceptual Bias and (Un)Democratic Behavior

  2022cited by this paper
• Creating compliance in crisis: messages, messengers, and masking up in Britain

  2022cited by this paper
• Radical American Partisanship

  2022cited by this paper
• Morbid Polarization: Exposure to COVID‐19 and Partisan Disagreement about Pandemic Response

  2022cited by this paper
• Democracy in times of the pandemic: explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies across European democracies

  2021cited by this paper
• Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?

  2021cited by this paper
• COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy

  2021cited by this paper
• When democratic experience distorts democracy: Citizen reactions to undemocratic incumbent behaviour

  2021cited by this paper
• Estimating the Persistence of Party Cue Influence in a Panel Survey Experiment

  2021cited by this paper
• Donald Trump and the Lie

  2021cited by this paper
• Parliaments in times of crisis: COVID-19, populism and executive dominance

  2021cited by this paper
• Pandemic politics: policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19

  2021cited by this paper
• COVID-19: a dual challenge to European liberal democracy

  2021cited by this paper
• No effect of partisan framing on opinions about the COVID-19 pandemic

  2021cited by this paper
• Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms

  2021cited by this paper
• A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)

  2021cited by this paper
• Surveillance, Security, and Liberal Democracy in the Post-COVID World

  2020cited by this paper
• Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

  2020influential reference
• The Policy Basis of Measured Partisan Animosity in the United States

  2020cited by this paper
• Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives

  2020cited by this paper
• Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• Sociodemographic and Psychological Correlates of Compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Measures in France

  2020cited by this paper
• The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?

  2020cited by this paper
• Messaging Mask Wearing During the COVID-19 Crisis: Ideological Differences

  2020cited by this paper
• When Should the Majority Rule? Experimental Evidence for Madisonian Judgments in Five Cultures

  2020cited by this paper
• Civil Liberties in Times of Crisis

  2020influential reference
• Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018

  2020cited by this paper
• Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies?

  2020cited by this paper
• Executive Accountability Beyond Outcomes: Experimental Evidence on Public Evaluations of Powerful Prime Ministers

  2020cited by this paper
• Crisis signaling: how Italy's coronavirus lockdown affected incumbent support in other European countries

  2020cited by this paper
• The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• The Political Impact of Affective Polarization: How Partisan Animus Shapes COVID-19 Attitudes

  2020cited by this paper
• Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not

  2020cited by this paper
• Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?

  2019cited by this paper
• Party Cues

  2019cited by this paper
• The European Union's authoritarian equilibrium

  2019cited by this paper
• Crises of Democracy

  2019cited by this paper
• Authoritarian attitudes and support for radical right populists

  2019cited by this paper
• Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency

  2019influential reference
• How Democracies Die

  2019cited by this paper
• Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters

  2019cited by this paper
• Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments

  2019cited by this paper
• Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration

  2018cited by this paper
• Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

  2018cited by this paper
• The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments

  2018cited by this paper
• The tie that divides: Cross‐national evidence of the primacy of partyism

  2018cited by this paper
• How Much Democratic Backsliding?

  2017cited by this paper
• Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises

  2017cited by this paper
• Multi-dimensional preferences for labour market reforms: a conjoint experiment

  2017cited by this paper
• Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World

  2017cited by this paper
• Disgust Sensitivity and Public Demand for Protection

  2016cited by this paper
• Popular Dictators: The Attitudinal Roots Of Electoral Authoritarianism

  2015cited by this paper
• Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity

  2015cited by this paper
• Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments

  2013cited by this paper
• Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government

  2012cited by this paper
• Polarizing cues.

  2012cited by this paper
• The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes Toward Immigrants

  2012cited by this paper
• Examining the Terror Exception Terrorism and Commitments to Civil Liberties

  2012cited by this paper
• Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror

  2011cited by this paper
• Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence

  2011cited by this paper
• Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public

  2011cited by this paper
• In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq

  2009cited by this paper
• Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public

  2009cited by this paper
• The news media

  2006cited by this paper
• Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World

  2004cited by this paper
• Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America

  2004cited by this paper
• Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism

  2003cited by this paper
• On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?

  2001cited by this paper
• The Authoritarian Specter

  1997cited by this paper
• The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law

  1997cited by this paper
• How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties

  1993cited by this paper
• The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes

  1978cited by this paper
• The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations

  1964cited by this paper
• The American voter

  1960cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.