An Ecogeomorphic Evaluation of the Post‐Flood Restoration of the Little Thompson River: A Colorado Front Range (USA) Stream

River restoration is a multibillion‐dollar industry, but oversight, assessment requirements, and frameworks remain disparate. This study examines the case of the Little Thompson River (Colorado, USA), a mountain stream disturbed by a 2013 flood (500‐year recurrence interval) and subsequently reconstructed for flood mitigation. We compare the Little Thompson River Restored Site to a Reference tributary impacted by the same flood event, allowing for an assessment of stream recovery under different circumstances. Results suggest the Reference Site is in a quasi‐equilibrium with ecogeomorphic variables, while the Restored Site is not. The Restored Site had a step‐pool/pool‐riffle design but a plane‐bed slope (0.024 m/m). Grain‐size analysis showed a distribution (D50 = 55 mm and D90 = 126 mm) not mobilized by typical flows (e.g., 2‐year), and most flows (> 2‐year) would not inundate the floodplain region. The Reference Site had expected (based on reference systems with similar watershed positions) pool‐riffle morphology and grain size (slope = 0.013 m/m; D50 = 38 mm and D90 = 108 mm), is mobilized by typical flows, and the floodplain region inundates at flows > 2‐year. Vegetation surveys showed that only Salix and naturally recruited Populus are prolific at the Restored Site, while the Reference Site has a denser and more diverse plant community. Our study suggests allowing for natural plant succession, primarily recruitment of Populus, complemented with low‐cost, effective, simple Salix plantings, and preserving seed banks where possible could aid future restoration projects. Our results raise questions about the efficacy of channel construction and revegetation efforts in post‐flood restoration of mountain streams and highlight simple recommendations for future restoration projects.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Rivers Research and Applications: an international journal devoted to river research and management

• Publication date

  2025-10-09

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/rra.70048
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE RESILIENT ST VRAIN PROJECT: HOW GEOMORPHOLOGY AND MACAROINVERTEBRATES PROVIDE INSIGHT TO FLOOD MITIGATION EFFORTS IN NORTHERN COLORADO

  2023cited by this paper
• Testing the effective-discharge paradigm in gravel-bed river restoration

  2022influential reference
• A Green New Balance: Interactions among riparian vegetation plant traits and morphodynamics in alluvial rivers

  2022cited by this paper
• Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration

  2021cited by this paper
• A Remote Field Course Implementing High-Resolution Topography Acquisition and Applications Applied to Geomorphology

  2021cited by this paper
• Geomorphic Classification of Rivers: An Updated Review

  2021cited by this paper
• The stream evolution triangle: Integrating geology, hydrology, and biology

  2019influential reference
• Resilience of riparian vegetation after restoration measures on River Inn

  2018cited by this paper
• Natural vs anthropogenic streams in Europe: History, ecology and implications for restoration, river-rewilding and riverine ecosystem services

  2018cited by this paper
• The influence of a vegetated bar on channel-bend flow dynamics

  2017cited by this paper
• Post-disturbance sediment recovery: Implications for watershed resilience

  2017cited by this paper
• Multiscale influence of woody riparian vegetation on fluvial topography quantified with ground‐based and airborne lidar

  2017cited by this paper
• Applying Functional Traits to Ecogeomorphic Processes in Riparian Ecosystems

  2017influential reference
• Spatial heterogeneity as a component of river geomorphic complexity

  2016influential reference
• Can the Regeneration of Vegetation from Riparian Seed Banks Support Biogeomorphic Succession and the Geomorphic Recovery of Degraded River Channels?

  2015cited by this paper
• Coupling fluvial‐hydraulic models to predict gravel transport in spatially variable flows

  2015cited by this paper
• The science and practice of river restoration

  2015influential reference
• Macroinvertebrates in streams: A review of some ecological factors

  2012cited by this paper
• Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels

  2012cited by this paper
• Restoration Seed Banks—A Matter of Scale

  2011cited by this paper
• What should these rivers look like? Historical range of variability and human impacts in the Colorado Front Range, USA

  2011cited by this paper
• Process-Based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems

  2010influential reference
• River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?

  2010cited by this paper
• Relation between flow, surface‐layer armoring and sediment transport in gravel‐bed rivers

  2008influential reference
• Natural Streams and the Legacy of Water-Powered Mills

  2008cited by this paper
• Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration? An overview of seed bank characteristics in European communities

  2008cited by this paper
• Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: A review of complementary approaches

  2007cited by this paper
• BED MATERIAL TRANSPORT AND THE MORPHOLOGY OF ALLUVIAL RIVER CHANNELS

  2006cited by this paper
• Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams

  2005influential reference
• Prediction of mountain stream morphology

  2005cited by this paper
• Standards for ecologically successful river restoration

  2005influential reference
• Design for Stream Restoration

  2003cited by this paper
• Ecological response to and management of increased flooding caused by climate change

  2002cited by this paper
• Paying for Restoration

  2000cited by this paper
• Channel narrowing by vertical accretion along the Green River near Green River, Utah

  1999cited by this paper
• The hydrological and geomorphological significance of forested floodplains

  1997cited by this paper
• THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION

  1997cited by this paper
• Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins

  1997influential reference
• The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function.

  1996cited by this paper
• PATTERNS OF ALLUVIAL RIVERS

  1985cited by this paper
• Regrowth of Quercus prinus and Associated Tree Species Following Regeneration Harvesting in the Ozark Hills of Illinois

  1981cited by this paper
• Effective and bankfull discharges of streams in the Yampa River basin, Colorado and Wyoming

  1980influential reference
• Roughness characteristics of natural channels

  1967cited by this paper
• Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes

  1960cited by this paper
• River channel patterns: Braided, meandering, and straight

  1957cited by this paper
• The Importance of Fluvial Morphology in Hydraulic Engineering

  1955cited by this paper
• A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material

  1954cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.