A novel risk model combining clinical and intravascular ultrasound-based calcific features to predict adverse outcomes in patients with severe coronary artery calcification undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the mACEF- Ca model

Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) significantly complicates percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), leading to increased procedural challenges and adverse outcomes. Existing clinical risk models such as the age, creatinine and ejection fraction (ACEF) score often lack lesion-specific anatomical data, limiting their predictive performance in high-risk cohorts. This retrospective study enrolled patients with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-confirmed severe CAC who underwent non-emergent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation. Independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over a median 2-year follow-up were identified using multivariate Cox regression. A novel modified ACEF score (mACEF) incorporating calcific features (mACEF-Ca) was constructed based on the original mACEF, presence of calcified nodule (CN), and a maximum calcium arc of 360°. Of the 785 included patients, 121 (15.4%) experienced MACE during the 2-year follow-up. Presence of a 360° calcium arc and CN were identified as independent predictors of MACE (HR = 1.63 and 2.61, respectively; both P < 0.001). The simplified mACEF-Ca formula was: mACEF + 1 (if maximum calcium arc = 360°) + 1 (if CN present). This model demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC = 0.778) compared to traditional ACEF-based models (all P < 0.05 by DeLong test). Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed significantly poorer event-free survival in patients with higher mACEF-Ca scores (log-rank P < 0.001). The mACEF-Ca score, combining clinical and IVUS-derived calcification parameters, enhances risk stratification in patients with severe CAC undergoing PCI. It offers a practical and effective tool for identifying high-risk individuals, guiding procedural planning, and informing post-procedural management strategies.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

• Publication date

  2025-10-10

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1186/s12872-025-05105-9PMID 41073910PMCID 12512807
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Prognostic Relevance of Type 4a Myocardial Infarction and Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

  2025cited by this paper
• Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  2024cited by this paper
• Calcified Nodule in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Therapeutic Challenges.

  2024cited by this paper
• Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification

  2024cited by this paper
• CVIT 2023 clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound

  2023influential reference
• Contemporary percutaneous management of coronary calcification: current status and future directions

  2023cited by this paper
• Extra-coronary Calcification and Cardiovascular Events: What Do We Know and Where Are We Heading?

  2022cited by this paper
• Clinical Utility of Intravascular Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.

  2022cited by this paper
• Predictive value of ACEF score for clinical prognosis of patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy

  2022cited by this paper
• 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

  2021cited by this paper
• Prediction of 5-Year Mortality in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome Treated with Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Role of the ACEF Score

  2021cited by this paper
• 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

  2021cited by this paper
• Intravascular Ultrasound–Derived Calcium Score to Predict Stent Expansion in Severely Calcified Lesions

  2021cited by this paper
• Predictive ability of ACEF and ACEF II score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the GLOBAL LEADERS study.

  2019cited by this paper
• Integrating the residual SYNTAX score to improve the predictive ability of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score for cardiac mortality in percutaneous coronary intervention patients

  2019influential reference
• Impact of the Coronary Artery Calcium Score on Mid- to Long-Term Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity Measured With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

  2018cited by this paper
• The ACEF II Risk Score for cardiac surgery: updated but still parsimonious

  2018cited by this paper
• ACEF score adapted to ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: The ACEF-STEMI score.

  2018influential reference
• Orbital and rotational atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery calcification

  2018cited by this paper
• Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

  2018cited by this paper
• 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

  2018cited by this paper
• Impact of Calcium on Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

  2017cited by this paper
• ACEF and clinical SYNTAX score in the risk stratification of patients with heavily calcified coronary stenosis undergoing rotational atherectomy with stent implantation

  2014influential reference
• EuroSCORE II versus additive and logistic EuroSCORE in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

  2013cited by this paper
• Incorporating glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the modification of diet in renal disease equation or the Cockcroft-Gault equations to improve the global accuracy of the Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

  2013influential reference
• The use and clinical outcomes of rotablation in challenging cases in the drug‐eluting stent era

  2013cited by this paper
• A global risk approach to identify patients with left main or 3-vessel disease who could safely and efficaciously be treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the SYNTAX Trial at 3 years.

  2012cited by this paper
• Simplifying clinical risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: the case for the ACEF (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) score.

  2012cited by this paper
• Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score.

  2012cited by this paper
• The easier, the better: age, creatinine, ejection fraction score for operative mortality risk stratification in a series of 29,659 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

  2011cited by this paper
• Assessment of the coronary calcification by optical coherence tomography.

  2011cited by this paper
• Value of Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF Score) in Assessing Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the ‘All-Comers' LEADERS Trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Risk of Assessing Mortality Risk in Elective Cardiac Operations: Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction, and the Law of Parsimony

  2009influential reference
• Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions

  2007cited by this paper
• The dilemma of diagnosing coronary calcification: angiography versus intravascular ultrasound.

  1996cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.