The Effects of Communicative Purposes on Lexicogrammatical Variation in EFL Prepared Public Speech: A Register‐Functional Approach

Prepared English public speaking (EPS) tasks are widely used in EFL programs to enhance learners’ oral communication skills. Yet little is known about how the communicative purposes embedded in different speech tasks shape learners’ linguistic choices in prepared spoken discourse. This study adopts a register‐functional (RF) approach and key feature (KF) analysis to investigate lexicogrammatical variation across two common EPS tasks: informative and persuasive speeches. The dataset comprises 236 speeches produced by 118 university EFL students, each annotated for 154 lexicogrammatical features using the Biber Tagger. Applying frequency, dispersion, and effect size criteria, 17 distinguishing features were identified—12 associated with informative and five with persuasive tasks. Functional interpretation revealed that informative speeches were characterized by features supporting audience engagement and structured information delivery, whereas persuasive speeches drew more heavily on features conveying stance and evaluation. These findings underscore the central role of communicative purpose in shaping learner discourse and demonstrate the value of corpus‐based RF analysis for advancing pedagogy, material development, and assessment in second language speaking.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  International Journal of Applied Linguistics

• Publication date

  2025-10-10

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/ijal.70019
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The role of communicative purpose in describing and interpreting lexico-grammatical variation in L2 writing

  2025cited by this paper
• The relative influence of language backgrounds, communicative text types, and disciplines in undergraduate student writing

  2024cited by this paper
• Key feature analysis: a simple, yet powerful method for comparing text varieties

  2023cited by this paper
• The effects of genre on the syntactic complexity of argumentative and expository writing by Chinese EFL learners

  2022cited by this paper
• Using corpus analysis to extend experimental research: Genre effects in L2 writing

  2021cited by this paper
• The development of temporal-spatial meaning in personal recounts of beginning L2 writers of German

  2021cited by this paper
• Register variation in L1 and L2 student writing

  2021cited by this paper
• How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?

  2021cited by this paper
• The Register-Functional Approach to Grammatical Complexity

  2021cited by this paper
• Revisiting genre effects on linguistic features of L2 writing: A usage‐based perspective

  2020cited by this paper
• Text-linguistic approaches to register variation

  2019cited by this paper
• Sources of college EFL learners' self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain

  2019cited by this paper
• Effects of task type on morphosyntactic complexity across proficiency

  2019cited by this paper
• Register Variation Online

  2018cited by this paper
• Oral presentations in higher education: a comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback

  2018cited by this paper
• The Semantic Features of “v+adv” in Native English Public Speaking Setting

  2018cited by this paper
• Epistemic Stance in Spoken L2 English: The Effect of Task and Speaker Style

  2017cited by this paper
• Task Effects on Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy: A Large-Scale Learner Corpus Analysis Employing Natural Language Processing Techniques

  2017cited by this paper
• The Linguistic Development of Students of English as a Second Language in Two Written Genres

  2017cited by this paper
• Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings

  2016cited by this paper
• Academic Writing Development at the University Level

  2016cited by this paper
• Predicting Patterns of Grammatical Complexity Across Language Exam Task Types and Proficiency Levels

  2016cited by this paper
• Same language, different functions: A cross-genre analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance

  2016cited by this paper
• Doing Corpus Linguistics

  2015cited by this paper
• Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation competence: A synthesis of research in higher education

  2015cited by this paper
• The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research

  2015cited by this paper
• Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality

  2015cited by this paper
• The Development and Test of the Public Speaking Competence Rubric

  2012cited by this paper
• Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are We Doing Enough and Doing it Right?.

  2011cited by this paper
• Speaking in front of the class: a multi-dimensional comparison of university student public speech and university language

  2011cited by this paper
• A Corpus-Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College-Level ESL Writers' Language Development

  2011cited by this paper
• Developing Noun Phrase Complexity at School Age: A Text-Embedded Cross-Linguistic Analysis

  2010cited by this paper
• An Introduction to Functional Grammar的“集大成”地位

  2009cited by this paper
• An integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the study of identity in speeches

  2005cited by this paper
• General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities.

  2000cited by this paper
• Cohesion in Argument and Narration at Three Grade Levels

  1987cited by this paper
• Audience and Mode of Discourse Effects on Syntactic Complexity in Writing at Two Grade Levels

  1979cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.