Expert Credibility Factors and Their Impact on Digital Innovation and Sustainability Adoption in China’s Social Media Ecosystem

The successful implementation of digital transformation initiatives depends critically on public trust in experts guiding these processes. In today’s digital media environment, expert trust faces significant challenges, potentially hindering sustainable innovation adoption. This study investigates how expert credibility dimensions and information characteristics shape trust in digital transformation experts among Chinese social media users. We employed a mixed-methods approach combining a survey of 850 Chinese social media users, a quasi-experiment testing a digital expert verification feature, and secondary data analysis. The study measured multiple dimensions of expert trust while examining relationships with expert cognition factors and media usage variables through regression, mediation, and structural equation modeling. Expert trust in digital transformation exists at moderate levels (M = 6.82/10), with higher trust in digital innovation research (M = 7.12) than specific sustainability recommendations (M = 6.59). Expert authenticity emerged as the strongest predictor of trust (β = 0.27), followed by professional competence (β = 0.21). A “digital exposure paradox” emerged whereby higher volumes of expert information negatively predicted trust (β = −0.18), while information quality positively predicted trust (β = 0.25). The digital verification feature causally enhanced trust (DID = 0.57), with institutional sources strengthening trust while user-generated content diminished it. The findings reveal that digital transformation expert trust involves multi-dimensional evaluations beyond traditional credibility assessments. The “digital exposure paradox” suggests that prioritizing information quality over quantity, demonstrating expert authenticity, and implementing verification mechanisms can enhance trust and accelerate sustainable digital transformation adoption.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Sustainability

• Publication date

  2025-10-11

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3390/su17209017
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Crisis of Expertise: What Does It Mean for Management Scholars?

  2025cited by this paper
• Public Health Communication and Trust: Opportunities for Understanding

  2025cited by this paper
• How credibility assessment technologies affect decision fairness in evidence-based investigations: A Bayesian perspective

  2024cited by this paper
• Digital platforms and development: Risks to competition and their regulatory implications in developing countries

  2024cited by this paper
• Purchasing in the digital age: A meta-analytical perspective on trust, risk, security, and e-WOM in e-commerce

  2024cited by this paper
• Trust models and theories in human–computer interaction: A systematic literature review

  2024cited by this paper
• The Pillars of Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research

  2024cited by this paper
• How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model

  2023cited by this paper
• Experts in Times of Pandemic: Reframing the Debate in the Context of Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere

  2023cited by this paper
• The digital imperative: Institutional pressures to digitalise

  2023cited by this paper
• Reconsidering expertise for public policymaking: The challenges of contestability

  2023cited by this paper
• State of science: refitting the human to nature

  2023cited by this paper
• [Environmental knowledge and environmental awareness among Generation Z students: An online survey at the University of Ulm].

  2023cited by this paper
• Science communication and public trust in science

  2023cited by this paper
• Establishing Trust in Experts During a Crisis: Expert Trustworthiness and Media Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  2022cited by this paper
• David Kosson—Be trustworthy, credible, approachable, and independent

  2022cited by this paper
• The independent effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on retraction believability: The moderating role of vested interest

  2022cited by this paper
• Status Distrust of Scientific Experts

  2022cited by this paper
• A critical review of the conceptualisation, operationalisation, and empirical literature on cognition‐based and affect‐based trust

  2022cited by this paper
• Balance as Credibility? How Presenting One- vs. Two-Sided Messages Affects Ratings of Scientists’ and Politicians’ Trustworthiness

  2022cited by this paper
• Either you control social media or social media controls you: understanding the impact of self‐control on excessive social media use from the dual‐system perspective

  2022cited by this paper
• The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback.

  2021cited by this paper
• Failures to disagree are essential for environmental science to effectively influence policy development

  2021cited by this paper
• Vaccine Hesitancy

  2021cited by this paper
• How trust, mistrust and distrust shape the governance of the COVID-19 crisis

  2021cited by this paper
• Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19 Orders

  2021cited by this paper
• What Is Critical About the Crisis of Expertise? A Review of Gil Eyal’s The Crisis of Expertise (2019, Cambridge: Polity Press)

  2021cited by this paper
• Is the younger generation a driving force toward achieving the sustainable development goals? Survey experiments

  2021cited by this paper
• Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality

  2021cited by this paper
• Why Are Scientific Experts Perceived as Trustworthy? Emotional Assessment within TV and YouTube Videos

  2020cited by this paper
• COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public

  2020cited by this paper
• Perceptions of Digital Health Education Among European Medical Students: Mixed Methods Survey

  2020cited by this paper
• Trust and Medical AI: The challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them

  2020cited by this paper
• The Evolving Field of Risk Communication

  2020cited by this paper
• Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of Scientists

  2020cited by this paper
• Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?

  2020cited by this paper
• Institutional quality, corruption, and impartiality: the role of process and outcome for citizen trust in public administration in 173 European regions

  2020cited by this paper
• The will for reason: voter demand for experts in office

  2020cited by this paper
• Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes

  2019cited by this paper
• Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media

  2019cited by this paper
• Epistemology in the Era of Fake News

  2018cited by this paper
• Political Trust in a Cynical Age

  2018cited by this paper
• Assessment of Expert Performance Compared Across Professional Domains

  2018cited by this paper
• Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection

  2017cited by this paper
• The Integrated User Satisfaction Model: Assessing Information Quality and System Quality as Second-order Constructs in System Administration

  2016cited by this paper
• Predictors of Perceptions of Scientists

  2015cited by this paper
• Learning to trust and trusting to learn: a theoretical framework.

  2015cited by this paper
• Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI)

  2015cited by this paper
• Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics

  2014cited by this paper
• Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network

  2014cited by this paper
• Reassessing expert knowledge and the politics of expertise

  2014cited by this paper
• Science, New Media, and the Public

  2013cited by this paper
• Communicating Food Risks in an Era of Growing Public Distrust: Three Case Studies

  2013cited by this paper
• Science on Television in the 21st Century

  2011cited by this paper
• Democracy's Distrust: Contested Values and the Decline of Expertise

  2011cited by this paper
• Public Trust in Government Concerning Tobacco Control in Japan

  2010cited by this paper
• Believe Me, I Have No Idea What I’m Talking About: The Effects of Source Certainty on Consumer Involvement and Persuasion

  2010cited by this paper
• Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research: Effects of Hedging on Scientists' and Journalists' Credibility

  2008cited by this paper
• The effects of information quality of mobile information services on user satisfaction and service acceptance–empirical evidence from Finland

  2008cited by this paper
• Trading zones and interactional expertise

  2007cited by this paper
• An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future

  2007cited by this paper
• Trust

  2006cited by this paper
• Is Trust an Epistemological Notion?

  2004cited by this paper
• The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty

  2003cited by this paper
• A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession.

  2002cited by this paper
• Source Credibility in Environmental Health – Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index

  2001cited by this paper
• Credibility and computing technology

  1999cited by this paper
• Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics

  1999cited by this paper
• Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust

  1998cited by this paper
• The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality

  1996cited by this paper
• An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust

  1995cited by this paper
• HERE AND EVERYWHERE: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge

  1995cited by this paper
• Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases

  1993cited by this paper
• Uncertainty as Symbolic Action in Disputes Among Experts

  1985cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.