Evidence syntheses, including systematic reviews, are a type of research that uses systematic, replicable methods to evaluate all available evidence on a specific question. They are built on the principles of research integrity, including rigor, transparency, and reproducibility. There is wide recognition that artificial intelligence (AI) and automation have the potential to transform the way we produce evidence syntheses, making the process significantly more efficient. However, this technology is potentially disruptive, characterized by opaque decision ‐ making and black ‐ box predictions, susceptible to overfitting, potentially embedded with algorithmic biases
Position statement on artificial intelligence (AI) use in evidence synthesis across Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence 2025
Ella Flemyng,Anna Noel-Storr,Biljana Macura,Gerald Gartlehner,James Thomas,Joerg J Meerpohl,Zoe Jordan,Jan Minx,Angelika Eisele-Metzger,Candyce Hamel,Paweł Jemioło,K. Porritt,M. Grainger
Published 2025 in JBI Evidence Synthesis
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
JBI Evidence Synthesis
- Publication date
2025-11-01
- Fields of study
Medicine, Computer Science, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-8 of 8 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-1 of 1 citing papers · Page 1 of 1