Bayesian design and analysis of two-arm cluster randomised trials using assurance: extension to binary outcomes and comparison of MCMC and INLA

The paper considers two different designs; a two-arm superiority cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a continuous outcome, and a twoarm superiority cluster RCT with a binary outcome. From a Bayesian perspective, for the analysis of the trial we use a (generalised) linear mixed effects model. We summarise the inference for the treatment effect for a cluster RCT based on the posterior distribution. Based on this inference we use assurance to choose the sample size. We consider and compare two different methods for the inference: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations (INLA), and consider their implications for the assurance. We consider the Specialist Pre-hospital redirection for ischemic stroke thrombectomy (SPEEDY) trial, an RCT which has co-primary outcomes of thrombectomy rate and time to thrombectomy, as a case study for the developed Bayesian RCT designs. We demonstrate our novel approach to the sample size calculation using assurance on the SPEEDY trial, based on the results of a formal prior elicitation exercise with two clinical experts. The paper considers a range of different scenarios for cluster RCTs to evaluate INLA and MCMC, to determine when each inference scheme should be used, balancing the computational cost in terms of speed and accuracy. We make recommendations for when each should be used.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2025-11-10

• Fields of study

  Mathematics

• Identifiers
  arXiv 2511.06912
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A comparison of computational algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials

  2024cited by this paper
• Hybrid sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials using assurance

  2023cited by this paper
• Bayesian design and analysis of two‐arm cluster randomized trials using assurance

  2022influential reference
• Effect of an Enhanced Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment on Thrombolysis Delivery During Emergency Stroke Care

  2020cited by this paper
• Bayesian Inference with INLA

  2020cited by this paper
• Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations (INLA)

  2019cited by this paper
• SHELF: The Sheffield Elicitation Framework

  2018cited by this paper
• Comparing INLA and OpenBUGS for hierarchical Poisson modeling in disease mapping.

  2015cited by this paper
• INLA or MCMC? A tutorial and comparative evaluation for spatial prediction in log-Gaussian Cox processes

  2012cited by this paper
• Bayesian inference for generalized linear mixed models.

  2010cited by this paper
• Posterior and Cross-validatory Predictive Checks: A Comparison of MCMC and INLA

  2010cited by this paper
• Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities

  2006cited by this paper
• JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling

  2003cited by this paper
• Bayesian methods of analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcome data.

  2001cited by this paper
• Bayesian methods for cluster randomized trials with continuous responses.

  2001cited by this paper
• Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed

  1981cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.