Auditory processing ability in Thai native speakers with the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test

Introduction Auditory processing disorder (APD) arises from dysfunctions within the central auditory nervous system (CANS). One key tool for assessing temporal auditory processing capabilities is the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test. While the GIN test serves as a critical tool, its accuracy may be influenced by linguistic factors. This research aims to establish preliminary normative data for the GIN test among young adult native Thai speakers and to compare potential performance differences across ears and various linguistic backgrounds. Methods This study included 52 native Thai speakers aged 18 to 25, all of whom had normal hearing confirmed through pure-tone audiometry, to examine auditory processing using the GIN test. The testing was conducted in an anechoic chamber to ensure standardized conditions. The results were analyzed based on the approximate gap-detection threshold (A.th.) value and the overall percent correct (OPC) value metrics. Results The study revealed that, among young adult native Thai speakers, the A.th. values were 5.12–0.81 milliseconds (ms.) in the right ear, 5.08–0.81 ms. in the left ear, and 5.04–0.68 ms. for both ears. The corresponding averages of OPC values were 69.94–7.66% for the right ear, 71.37–7.21% for the left ear, and 71.35–6.72% for both ears, respectively. While no significant differences were observed in the threshold between ears, a notable discrepancy in response accuracy was noted, with the right ear showing lower accuracy than the left ear. Significant differences were also found when compared to English, Korean, and Portuguese language users, but not when compared to Polish language users. Conclusion The study revealed comparable temporal processing abilities among young adult native Thai speakers, as indicated by similar A.th. values across both ears. However, differences in the OPC value responses suggest potential asymmetries in auditory processing mechanisms. Additionally, linguistic factors appeared to influence the outcomes, as evidenced by variations in the A.th. values between Thai speakers and individuals from other linguistic backgrounds. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating language-specific norms when assessing the APD.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  PeerJ

• Publication date

  2025-11-06

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Linguistics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.7717/peerj.20207PMID 41221209PMCID 12598593
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• British Society of Audiology Position Statement & Practice Guidance: Auditory Processing Disorder (APD)

  2018cited by this paper
• STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

  2015cited by this paper
• AUDITORY TEMPORAL PROCESSING TESTS - NORMATIVE DATA FOR POLISH-SPEAKING ADULTS.

  2015influential reference
• Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics

  2014cited by this paper
• Temporal Resolution Ability in Korean Population byGap-in-Noise (GIN)

  2013cited by this paper
• An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder.

  2012cited by this paper
• Cross-domain Effects of Music and Language Experience on the Representation of Pitch in the Human Auditory Brainstem

  2011cited by this paper
• Temporal processing abilities across different age groups.

  2011cited by this paper
• The gaps-in-noise test: Gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults

  2008influential reference
• The gaps‐in‐noise (gin) test and its diagnostic significance

  2008influential reference
• GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) Test Performance in Subjects with Confirmed Central Auditory Nervous System Involvement

  2005influential reference

• No citing papers are available for this paper.