A longstanding question in ecology asks whether or not species that achieve large geographic ranges also have large climatic niche breadths. Using a dataset of ~250,000 terrestrial plant species spanning diverse clades (bryophytes, ferns, gymnosperms, and flowering plants), we demonstrate a consistent positive relationship between geographic range size and climatic niche breadth across latitudinal and elevational gradients. This relationship holds across major phylogenetic groups, suggesting a general biogeographical rule for range size variation. Our findings indicate that latitudinal and elevational gradients in range size arise from selective pressures and species sorting based on climatic tolerance. Additionally, we show that species with larger range sizes tend to be ecologically dominant, supporting a long-suspected connection between range size, niche breadth, and local and regional abundance. Our results suggest a spectrum of dominance, where species with extensive geographic ranges and broader climatic tolerances tend to be more abundant. We posit that the relationship between range size, niche breadth, and ecological dominance is an emergent macroecological pattern that can be used for understanding and predicting the impacts of climate change on species distributions.
General laws of biodiversity: Climatic niches predict plant range size and ecological dominance globally.
G. Moulatlet,C. Merow,Brian S. Maitner,Bradley L. Boyle,Xiao Feng,Amy E. Frazier,César Hinojo-Hinojo,Erica A. Newman,Patrick R. Roehrdanz,Lei Song,Fabricio Villalobos,P. Marquet,Jean‐Christian Svenning,B. Enquist
Published 2025 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Publication date
2025-11-11
- Fields of study
Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-71 of 71 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-3 of 3 citing papers · Page 1 of 1