Contrasting organizational responses to femicide in Mexico’s public health crisis

Femicide—the gender-motivated killing of women—remains an urgent public health and human rights crisis in Latin America. In Mexico, legal reforms have established formal mechanisms for prevention and response, yet implementation remains fragmented, particularly in regions marked by structural violence and institutional distrust. This study examines how femicide is conceptualized and addressed by both formal institutions and grassroots organizations in two distinct contexts: Mexico City and rural Michoacán. Drawing on 64 in-depth interviews and participant observations conducted between 2022 and 2024, this qualitative study employs a comparative case study design to explore how divergent organizational frameworks, political conditions, and cultural logics shape femicide response. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in discourse, action, and collaboration across formal and community-based actors. Findings reveal two fundamentally different logics of femicide response. Formal institutions emphasize legal harmonization, training protocols, and policy compliance metrics—reflecting a technocratic model of prevention aligned with bureaucratic governance. Grassroots actors, by contrast, center relational care, symbolic resistance, and immediate community mobilization. These differences are not merely operational, but epistemic: institutional actors often devalue lived experience and emotional labor, while grassroots actors articulate survivor-defined safety, cultural legitimacy, and trust as central to prevention. In rural and high-impunity regions, community-led responses often function as the only reliable form of protection and accountability. Femicide prevention frameworks in Mexico must move beyond symbolic gestures of inclusion and begin to reckon with the structural exclusion of grassroots knowledge and labor. Meaningful response requires a shift in power and priorities—one that values community knowledge, centers survivor-defined metrics of safety and trust, and explores models of shared governance in contexts where institutional systems are distrusted or absent. In such settings, grassroots responses are not peripheral—they are essential.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  BMC Public Health

• Publication date

  2025-11-12

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1186/s12889-025-24968-3PMID 41225432PMCID 12613736
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Women’s experiences of homelessness and violence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada’s largest city: an integrated qualitative analysis of clients of violence against women organizations and encampment residents

  2025cited by this paper
• Assessment of intimate partner violence victimization and its association with the psychological state of abused women and social support in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

  2024cited by this paper
• Assessing risk for severe domestic violence and related homicides perpetrated by partners and in-laws: adapted danger assessments for women in abusive relationships in India

  2024cited by this paper
• “When you leave your country, this is what you’re in for”: experiences of structural, legal, and gender-based violence among asylum-seeking women at the Mexico-U.S. border

  2023cited by this paper
• Femicide and Feminicide in Mexico: Patterns and Trends in Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Regions

  2021cited by this paper
• The architecture of feminicide: The state, inequalities, and everyday gender violence in Honduras

  2017cited by this paper
• Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys.

  2015cited by this paper
• The Global Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women

  2013cited by this paper
• Violence against women: an urgent public health priority.

  2011cited by this paper
• Necropolitics, Narcopolitics, and Femicide: Gendered Violence on the Mexico-U.S. Border

  2011cited by this paper
• Militarized Humanitarianism Meets Carceral Feminism: The Politics of Sex, Rights, and Freedom in Contemporary Antitrafficking Campaigns

  2010cited by this paper
• Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research

  2010cited by this paper
• Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond "Politics"

  2010cited by this paper
• Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness

  2008cited by this paper
• The intersection of intimate partner violence against women and HIV/AIDS: a review

  2008cited by this paper
• Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing

  2007cited by this paper
• At the Crossroads of Human Rights and Anthropology: Toward a Critically Engaged Activist Research

  2006cited by this paper
• Deconstructing and Locating Survivor Discourse: Dynamics of Narrative, Empowerment, and Resistance for Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

  2003cited by this paper
• Spatial Govemmentality and the New Urban Social Order: Controlling Gender Violence through Law

  2001cited by this paper
• Ending violence against women.

  1999cited by this paper
• Ending violence against women.

  1999cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.