This systematic review examines peer-reviewed literature (2014–2024) on aquatic health research in Alberta’s Bow River Basin to assess the inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge and collaboration in Western scientific studies. Despite growing recognition of the value of Indigenous ways of knowing, such as holistic stewardship and place-based practices, our analysis of 69 regional publications reveals minimal meaningful co-creation with Indigenous communities. Most studies relied on disciplinarily siloed, quantitative endpoints (e.g., water quantity modelling), with only one study explicitly co-developing research methods and outcomes with Indigenous partners (Siksika Nation). A parallel review of National Sciences and Engineering and Research Council grants (2020–2024) showed relative increases in approvals for community-based research, yet corresponding peer-reviewed outputs remain scarce. This disparity highlights some potential systemic barriers to meaningful collaboration, such as rigid academic timelines and tokenistic “integration” of Indigenous Knowledge. Key recommendations include mandatory Indigenous data stewardship training, flexible funding structures to support relationship-building, and recognition of nontraditional research deliverables. The findings underscore the urgent need for equitable partnerships that center Indigenous voices from project inception to dissemination, ensuring culturally relevant and sustainable water management in the Bow River Basin and more broadly.
Understanding collaborations and community partnerships in aquatic research: a review of literature from the Bow River Basin, 2014–2024
David C. Barrett,Breanna K. Sayles,Aphra M. Sutherland,Vonn Beaulieu,Robert Crow Chief,Wylie Pietsch,Kerry Black
Published 2025 in Facets
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Facets
- Publication date
2025-01-01
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-26 of 26 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1