The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s 2025 draft briefing on long-term hazard resilience is commendable in emphasising anticipatory governance. However, it still exemplifies broader limitations in risk assessment focusing on familiar localnatural hazards while excluding global catastrophic risk. We examine how current risk reduction approaches remain trappedwithin frameworks addressing symptoms rather than systemic forces. Effective resilience requires expanding hazard scope to includeglobal hazards: large-scale (nuclear) conflict, large global volcanic eruptions, and bioengineered pandemics. Building resilience tothese and similar risks requires recognising cascade dynamics and implementing transparent approaches to generalised resilience toensure basic needs.
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Policy Quarterly
- Publication date
2025-11-09
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-25 of 25 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1