Judgements of Propaganda Near and Far: National Identity and Media Evaluations

Western media often critiques foreign governments for their propaganda efforts while ignoring similar efforts by their own government. We predicted that individuals would demonstrate a similar bias. An experiment with 282 Canadian participants revealed just the opposite: when asked overtly, participants judged a video attributed to their own government to be more like propaganda than identical foreign media. When asked covertly (e.g., about the video's bias), we observed no effect, and national identity was not a moderator for Canadians. In a direct replication, Americans ( N  = 457) also judged domestic videos as more like propaganda than foreign ones, whether perceptions of propaganda were measured overtly or covertly. This difference was especially true of those lower and average in national identity, compared to those higher. A follow‐up study demonstrated that Americans ( N  = 380) who are left‐leaning are more likely to show this bias against domestic media, compared to those who are centrist or right‐leaning. These studies demonstrate that people can be more critical of their own government's messaging relative to the same messaging by a foreign power, the opposite of holding a self‐serving double standard.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  European Journal of Social Psychology

• Publication date

  2025-11-11

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/ejsp.70035
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Active rejection or passive indifference? Mixed-methods evidence on national (dis)identification

  2024cited by this paper
• Propaganda, Presumed Influence, and Collective Protest

  2021cited by this paper
• The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

  2019cited by this paper
• Cultural Distance

  2018cited by this paper
• We made history: Citizens of 35 countries overestimate their nation's role in world history.

  2018cited by this paper
• lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models

  2017cited by this paper
• Perspective taking reduces the fundamental attribution error

  2015cited by this paper
• Elaboration and Validation Processes: Implications for Media Attitude Change

  2015cited by this paper
• Asymmetries in perceptions of self and others' hypocrisy: Rethinking the meaning and perception of the construct.

  2015cited by this paper
• The CIA in Hollywood: how the agency shapes film and television

  2015cited by this paper
• National Culture as Value Orientations: Consequences of Value Differences and Cultural Distance

  2014cited by this paper
• Social Progress Index 2014

  2014cited by this paper
• Shame and the motivation to change the self.

  2014cited by this paper
• Restore and protect motivations following shame

  2010cited by this paper
• Shame Proneness and Guilt Proneness: Toward the Further Understanding of Reactions to Public and Private Transgressions

  2010cited by this paper
• Oxford English Dictionary.

  2008cited by this paper
• Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity

  2008cited by this paper
• American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement

  2007cited by this paper
• Propaganda and Mass Persuasion: A Historical Encyclopedia, 1500 to the Present (review)

  2006cited by this paper
• Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: the self as an evaluative base.

  2005cited by this paper
• Propaganda and Mass Persuasion

  2003cited by this paper
• The role of public exposure in moral and nonmoral shame and guilt.

  2002cited by this paper
• Social categorization moderates social projection.

  2002cited by this paper
• Self-Threat Magnifies the Self-Serving Bias: A Meta-Analytic Integration

  1999cited by this paper
• Propaganda.

  1999cited by this paper
• Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so.

  1999cited by this paper
• Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, Third Edition

  1999cited by this paper
• A Chronology and Glossary of Propaganda in the United States

  1996cited by this paper
• The Self-Perpetuating National Self-Image: Cognitive Biases in Perceptions of International Interventions

  1993cited by this paper
• U.S. and Canadian attitudes toward international interactions: a cross-national test of the double-standard hypothesis

  1992influential reference
• Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness

  1992cited by this paper
• Shame

  1992cited by this paper
• Moral affect: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

  1991cited by this paper
• The case for motivated reasoning.

  1990cited by this paper
• Biases in the Perception and Cognition of the Actions of Enemies

  1989cited by this paper
• Perceiving one's own traits and others': The multifaceted self.

  1988cited by this paper
• Self-extensions: A conceptualization

  1988cited by this paper
• Perceiving one's own traits and others': the multifaceted self

  1988cited by this paper
• Propaganda studies in American social science: The rise and fall of the critical paradigm

  1987cited by this paper
• Propaganda: What it is

  1985cited by this paper
• Conceiving the self

  1979cited by this paper
• Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses.

  1979cited by this paper
• An experimental investigation of the double standard in the perception of international affairs

  1979cited by this paper
• The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1

  1977cited by this paper
• Social identity and intergroup behaviour

  1974cited by this paper
• Experiments in intergroup discrimination.

  1970cited by this paper
• A factor-analytic study of the double standard in attitudes toward U.S. and Russian actions.

  1968cited by this paper
• Attitudes toward U.S. and Russian Actions: A Double Standard

  1965cited by this paper
• THE NAIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTION

  1958cited by this paper
• The rape of the masses : the psychology of totalitarian political propaganda

  1940cited by this paper
• The Function of the Propagandist

  1928cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.