To what extent do people prioritize living in a democracy over other indicators of good governance or personal well-being? This question has become contested as democracies come under pressure worldwide. We provide an answer through cross-national conjoint experiments in which survey respondents choose between hypothetical countries that differ in terms of societal-level attributes (e.g., elections, health care) and individual-level outcomes that the respondent would experience (e.g., wealth, minority status). People across Egypt, India, Italy, Japan, Thailand, and the United States consistently prioritize living in a safe country with free and fair elections over other factors, including other components of democracy like civil liberties and checks and balances. Regarding tradeoffs, many people would forfeit democratic elections to avoid living in a dangerous society but not to obtain wealth and other goods. Electoral democracy is attractive globally but can be undermined by concerns about crime and safety.
Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries
Jonathan A. Chu,Scott Williamson,Eddy S. F. Yeung
Published 2025 in Comparative Political Studies
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Comparative Political Studies
- Publication date
2025-11-11
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-78 of 78 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-2 of 2 citing papers · Page 1 of 1