Pain management remains inadequate despite numerous studies on undertreatment. Addressing this issue in the emergency department (ED) requires an organizational perspective. This expert-consensus case study aimed to model the pain journey in the ED (DELPHI-based), and perform a risk analysis using a failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). Seven experts participated to a six-step process. A care pathway was provided, structured by five management phases, including 17 situations and four repetitive mechanisms at risk for oligoanalgesia. Then, situations were classified into three criticality levels and incorporated into a risk map, with six high-risk situations throughout the care pathway. A root cause analysis finally highlighted redundant contributing factor themes and key failure factors in pain management, such as “communication”, "decision support and protocolization", and “pain education”. These management issues are relatively accessible, do not require complex or costly resources and can be optimized through concrete actions. Despite numerous high-risk situations, only a few required prioritizations, underscoring the challenge of ED pain assessment, beyond improving pain-intensity scoring at triage, and the need to individualize treatments. In high-pressure care environments, FMECA provides a framework for identifying failures and informing action plans alongside protocol development, adaptable to pain management.
Emergency department pathway for pain management using DELPHI approach and criticality analysis
Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles,Philippe Mayran,Cassandre Follet,F. Carrouel,Claude Dussart,Virginie-Eve Lvovschi
Published 2025 in Scientific Reports
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Scientific Reports
- Publication date
2025-11-19
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-77 of 77 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1