The effects of spatial framing and attribute range on the measurement of nonuse values of biodiversity change

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Resource and Energy Economics

• Publication date

  2025-11-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101539
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Public perceptions of biodiversity and the value of its conservation

  2025cited by this paper
• Mitigating cost vector effects in stated choice experiments using cheap talk and opt-out reminders

  2024cited by this paper
• Enhancing the face validity of choice experiments: A simple diagnostic check

  2024cited by this paper
• Why it matters how biodiversity is measured in environmental valuation studies compared to conservation science

  2024cited by this paper
• Biophysical Measures to Support Analysis and Communication of Existence Values.

  2023cited by this paper
• Valuing improvements in the ecological integrity of local and regional waters using the biological condition gradient

  2023cited by this paper
• More in Good Condition or Less in Bad Condition? Valence-Based Framing Effects in Environmental Valuation

  2021cited by this paper
• What are we measuring? A review of metrics used to describe biodiversity in offsets exchanges

  2020cited by this paper
• Modelling Strategies for Discontinuous Distance Decay in Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services

  2020cited by this paper
• Spatial Dimensions of Stated Preference Valuation in Environmental and Resource Economics: Methods, Trends and Challenges

  2020cited by this paper
• Relative Versus Absolute Commodity Measurements in Benefit Transfer: Consequences for Validity and Reliability

  2020cited by this paper
• The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses

  2019cited by this paper
• Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application

  2019cited by this paper
• Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments

  2019cited by this paper
• Preferences for forest structural attributes in Germany – Evidence from a choice experiment

  2018cited by this paper
• Modelling and projecting the response of local terrestrial biodiversity worldwide to land use and related pressures: the PREDICTS project

  2018cited by this paper
• Spatial and Scope Effects: Valuations of Coastal Management Practices

  2018cited by this paper
• Reliability and Validity in Nonmarket Valuation

  2018cited by this paper
• Substitution Effects and Spatial Preference Heterogeneity in Single- and Multiple-Site Choice Experiments

  2018cited by this paper
• Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

  2017cited by this paper
• D-efficient or deficient? A robustness analysis of stated choice experimental designs

  2017cited by this paper
• Correcting for non-response bias in contingent valuation surveys concerning environmental non-market goods: an empirical investigation using an online panel

  2016cited by this paper
• The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

  2016cited by this paper
• Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment

  2016cited by this paper
• How to value biodiversity in environmental management

  2015cited by this paper
• Ecosystem Services Indicators: Improving the Linkage between Biophysical and Economic Analyses

  2015cited by this paper
• Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity

  2015cited by this paper
• The Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choices in an Environmental Context

  2015cited by this paper
• The complexity of biodiversity: A biological perspective on economic valuation

  2015cited by this paper
• Revealing lay people's perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method

  2014cited by this paper
• Biodiversity: Its Meanings, Roles, and Status

  2014cited by this paper
• Essential Biodiversity Variables

  2013cited by this paper
• Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative When Prices Aren't Available

  2012cited by this paper
• From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number?

  2012cited by this paper
• Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless

  2012cited by this paper
• Integrating Ecology and Economics for Restoration: Using Ecological Indicators in Valuation of Ecosystem Services

  2012cited by this paper
• Enhancing the Content Validity of Stated Preference Valuation: The Structure and Function of Ecological Indicators

  2012cited by this paper
• Public Preferences for Environmental Policy Responsibility

  2011cited by this paper
• Indices of biotic integrity in stated preference valuation of aquatic ecosystem services

  2011cited by this paper
• Testing the Fundamental Assumption of Choice Experiments: Are Values Absolute or Relative?

  2011cited by this paper
• Embedding effects in choice experiment valuations of environmental preservation projects

  2011cited by this paper
• Preferences for site and environmental functions when selecting forthcoming national parks.

  2010cited by this paper
• Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change

  2009cited by this paper
• Valuing changes in forest biodiversity

  2009cited by this paper
• Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity

  2009cited by this paper
• Willingness to Pay for Land Preservation across States and Jurisdictional Scale: Implications for Benefit Transfer

  2009cited by this paper
• Testing for Differences in Benefit Transfer Values between State and Regional Frameworks

  2008cited by this paper
• What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity

  2008cited by this paper
• On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a Mixed Logit Model for vehicle choice

  2006cited by this paper
• A biodiversity intactness index

  2005cited by this paper
• Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space

  2005cited by this paper
• Biodiversity: An index of intactness

  2005cited by this paper
• Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes

  2004cited by this paper
• Economics and the design of nature conservation policy: a case study of wild goose conservation in Scotland using choice experiments

  2003cited by this paper
• Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification

  2002cited by this paper
• Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: An application in health care

  2002cited by this paper
• Valuing biological diversity: issues and overview

  2001cited by this paper
• USING THE CORRECT STATISTICAL TEST FOR THE EQUALITY OF REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS

  1998cited by this paper
• Problems in valuing the benefits of biodiversity protection

  1995cited by this paper

• Corporate Preferences for Biodiversity Investment: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Medium and Large European Firms

  2026cites this paper