SCIENCE@home

What's Best About Best Friends: Higher-Ranked Friend Nominations are More Stable and More Likely to be Reciprocated than Lower-Ranked Nominations.

Madeleine Guillont,Molly Selover,Goda Kaniušonytė,Brett Laursen

Published 2025 in International Journal of Behavioral Development

ABSTRACT

Best friends differ from other friends in terms of their perceived quality, but much is unknown about features that set them apart. The present study examines the stability and reciprocity of friend nominations as a function of their rank. Participants included 580 (312 girls, 268 boys) public primary- and middle-school students (ages 9-13) in Florida (U.S.) and Lithuania. Twice during a single academic year, participants nominated and rank-ordered friends from a roster of classmates. Stable friend nominees (i.e., nominated as a friend in the fall and the spring) and reciprocated friend nominees (i.e., friend nominations returned by the target) were ranked higher than unstable and unreciprocated nominees. Among those making 5 (the median) nominations at the outset, 1st and 2nd ranked friends were more stable and more likely to be reciprocated than 4th and 5th ranked friends. Similar results emerged among those making fewer friend nominations. Results did not differ across locations, underscoring the assertion that best friends ought not be equated with other friends in empirical studies of friendship.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-40 of 40 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

  • No citing papers are available for this paper.

Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1