Conflict frames in the wild: win-lose frames are more common, but mixed and win-win frames are more effective

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Journal of Economic Psychology

• Publication date

  2026-01-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102868
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The framing of elections: cooperation vs. competition

  2025cited by this paper
• Improving intergroup relations with meta-perception correction interventions.

  2024cited by this paper
• Decision-makers self-servingly navigate the equality-efficiency trade-off of free partner choice in social dilemmas among unequals

  2024cited by this paper
• Realizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation

  2024cited by this paper
• Economic Inequality Fosters the Belief That Success Is Zero-Sum

  2023cited by this paper
• In it to win it? Comparative evaluation increases zero-sum beliefs.

  2023cited by this paper
• An inconvenient truth: Difficult problems rarely have easy solutions

  2023cited by this paper
• Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies

  2023cited by this paper
• Experimental studies of conflict: Challenges, solutions, and advice to junior scholars

  2023cited by this paper
• The psychology of zero-sum beliefs

  2023cited by this paper
• Is status a zero-sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people's preference for dominance but not prestige.

  2022cited by this paper
• Conflict Strength: Measuring the Tension Between Cooperative and Competitive Incentives in Experimental Negotiation Tasks

  2022cited by this paper
• What is social psychology? The construal principle.

  2022cited by this paper
• Dynamic fairness in repeated bargaining with risk

  2022cited by this paper
• Give and take frames in shared-resource negotiations

  2022cited by this paper
• Conflict misperceptions between citizens and foreigners across the globe

  2022cited by this paper
• Strength‐is‐Weakness: The (ir)relevant relation between resources and payoffs in coalition formation

  2022cited by this paper
• The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs.

  2021cited by this paper
• Majority members misperceive even "win-win" diversity policies as unbeneficial to them.

  2021cited by this paper
• The impact of leader dominance on employees' zero-sum mindset and helping behavior.

  2021cited by this paper
• Silence is golden: Extended silence, deliberative mindset, and value creation in negotiation.

  2021cited by this paper
• Multi-issue offers strategy and joint gains in negotiations: How low-trust negotiators get things done

  2021cited by this paper
• What causes the Strength‐is‐Weakness effect in coalition formation: Passive adoption or active selection of self‐serving allocation rules?

  2021cited by this paper
• Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians?: Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs.

  2021cited by this paper
• Personal relative deprivation and the belief that economic success is zero-sum.

  2021cited by this paper
• Win-win denial: The psychological underpinnings of zero-sum thinking.

  2020cited by this paper
• The “fixed” pie perception and strategy in dyadic versus multiparty negotiations

  2020cited by this paper
• Zero‐sum beliefs shape advantaged allies’ support for collective action

  2020cited by this paper
• Interdependence and cooperation in daily life.

  2020cited by this paper
• Behavioural climate policy

  2020cited by this paper
• Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions

  2020cited by this paper
• Making behavioral science integral to climate science and action

  2020cited by this paper
• Policy design for the Anthropocene

  2019cited by this paper
• And sympathy is what we need my friend—Polite requests improve negotiation results

  2019cited by this paper
• Framing and fighting: The impact of conflict frames on political attitudes

  2019cited by this paper
• Multiple equivalent simultaneous offers (MESOs) reduce the negotiator dilemma: How a choice of first offers increases economic and relational outcomes

  2019cited by this paper
• Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk

  2019cited by this paper
• Questioning white losses and anti-white discrimination in the United States

  2019cited by this paper
• The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game

  2019cited by this paper
• Archival research: Expanding the methodological toolkit in social psychology

  2018cited by this paper
• Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population

  2018cited by this paper
• More than a Phase: Form and Features of a General Theory of Negotiation

  2018cited by this paper
• Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch's t-test Instead of Student's t-test with Unequal Group Sizes

  2017cited by this paper
• Belief in a Zero-Sum Game as a Social Axiom

  2015cited by this paper
• Trust, Trustworthiness, and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Bridging China and the United States

  2014cited by this paper
• Egocentrism drives misunderstanding in conflict and negotiation

  2014cited by this paper
• Mental Models at Work

  2014cited by this paper
• Challenge and threat responses to anger communication in coalition formation

  2013cited by this paper
• Do You Want to Convince Me or to Be Understood?

  2012cited by this paper
• The Paradox of Participation Experiments

  2012cited by this paper
• Mind games: the mental representation of conflict.

  2012cited by this paper
• Honesty pays: On the benefits of having and disclosing information in coalition bargaining☆

  2011cited by this paper
• 20. A history of social conflict and negotiation research

  2010cited by this paper
• Social conflict: the emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation

  2010cited by this paper
• Knowing others' preferences degrades the quality of group decisions.

  2010cited by this paper
• The Weirdest People in the World

  2009cited by this paper
• Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent

  2008cited by this paper
• Biased Information Search in Homogeneous Groups: Confidence as a Moderator for the Effect of Anticipated Task Requirements

  2008cited by this paper
• Get angry, get out: The interpersonal effects of anger communication in multiparty negotiation

  2008cited by this paper
• Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: experimental and longitudinal evidence.

  2007cited by this paper
• Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups.

  2007cited by this paper
• Self-interest and fairness in coalition formation: A social utility approach to understanding partner selection and payoff allocations in groups

  2007cited by this paper
• Game theory and human evolution: a critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games.

  2006cited by this paper
• Disparate methods and common findings in the study of negotiation

  2005cited by this paper
• The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation

  2005cited by this paper
• Conflict Frames and the Use of Deception: Are Competitive Negotiators Less Ethical?

  2005cited by this paper
• The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach.

  2004cited by this paper
• An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations

  2003cited by this paper
• PHASES, TRANSITIONS AND INTERRUPTIONS: MODELING PROCESSES IN MULTI‐PARTY NEGOTIATIONS

  2003cited by this paper
• Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan.

  2001cited by this paper
• Negotiation.

  2000cited by this paper
• Unfixing the fixed pie: a motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation.

  2000cited by this paper
• Getting to best: efficiency versus optimality in negotiation

  2000cited by this paper
• Psychology and Economics

  1997cited by this paper
• The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers

  1996cited by this paper
• LOSE-LOSE AGREEMENTS IN INTERDEPENDENT DECISION MAKING

  1996cited by this paper
• Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction

  1995cited by this paper
• Conflict Frames of Reference: Implications for Dispute Processes and Outcomes

  1994cited by this paper
• Speech Patterns and the Concept of Utility in Cognitive Maps: The Case of Integrative Bargaining

  1993cited by this paper
• Information exchange in negotiation

  1991cited by this paper
• Social perception in negotiation

  1990cited by this paper
• Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict.

  1990cited by this paper
• Arbitration and distributive justice: Equity or equality?

  1987cited by this paper
• Arbitrator Decision Making: When are Final Offers Important?

  1985cited by this paper
• Themes in the Mediation of Social Conflict

  1985cited by this paper
• Negotiator Judgment

  1983cited by this paper
• The Role of Perspective-Taking Ability in Negotiating under Different Forms of Arbitration

  1983cited by this paper
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

  1981cited by this paper
• Interpersonal relations — a theory of interdependence

  1979cited by this paper
• A revision of Caplow's coalition theory

  1967cited by this paper
• The social psychology of everyday life.

  1934cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.