SCIENCE@home

Evaluating Remotely Sensed Spectral Indices to Quantify Seagrass in Support of Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management in a Marine Protected Area of Western Australia

N. Konzewitsch,Lara Mist,Scott N. Evans

Published 2025 in Remote Sensing

ABSTRACT

Understanding and monitoring benthic habitat distribution is essential for implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). Satellite remote sensing offers a rapid and cost-effective approach to marine habitat assessments; however, its application requires context-specific adjustment to account for environmental variability and differing study aims. As such, predictor variables must be tailored to the specific site and target habitat. This study uses Sentinel-2 Level 2A surface reflectance satellite imagery and stability selection via Random Forest Recursive Feature Elimination to assess the importance of remote sensing indices for mapping moderately deep (<20 m) seagrass habitats in relation to the Marine Stewardship Council-certified Western Australia Enhanced Greenlip Abalone Fishery (WAEGAF). Of the seven indices tested, the Normalised Difference Aquatic Vegetation Index (NDAVI) and Depth Invariant Index for the blue and green bands were selected in the optimal model on every run. The kernelised NDAVI and Water-Adjusted Vegetation Index also scored highly (both 0.92) and were included in the final classification and regression models. Both models performed well and predicted a similar cover and distribution of seagrass within the fishery compared to the surrounding area, providing a baseline and supporting EBFM of the WAEGAF within the surrounding marine protected area. Importantly, the use of indices from freely accessible ready-to-use satellite products via Google Earth Engine workflows and expedited ground truth image annotation using highly accurate (0.96) automatic image annotation provides a rapidly repeatable method for delivering ecosystem information for this fishery.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-60 of 60 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

  • No citing papers are available for this paper.

Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1