Demystifying inconsistent two-sample mendelian randomization estimations using selection diagram

Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization (TSMR) analysis is a widely used method for inferring causal effect in the presence of unmeasured confounding. However, causal inferences may be biased if the distributions of key variables (e.g., exposures, outcomes, and confounders) differ across populations. Such discrepancies in the distributions of key variables between the two populations are referred to as different local mechanisms. This paper aims to clarify the impact of different local mechanisms on the estimation of the Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) in TSMR analyses using selection diagrams. We first uncover and formally define the Complete and Partial Inconsistent TSMR Estimations (InTSMRE). Subsequently, we propose a criterion of No InTSMRE in the context of continuous and binary outcomes. Following this, we introduce the LATE Ratio to evaluate the deviation of the LATE estimate from the true causal effect. Finally, we demonstrate that the violation of the Monotonicity condition exacerbates the occurrences of the Complete InTSMRE; otherwise only the Partial InTSMRE occurs. Additionally, through simulation studies, we illustrate the specific conditions under which these InTSMRE arise. We explore the LATEs of Waist-to-hip ratio on Type 2 diabetes in European and mixed populations, demonstrating the phenomenon of the InTSMRE.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  BMC Medical Research Methodology

• Publication date

  2025-12-12

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1186/s12874-025-02707-xPMID 41388250PMCID 12859973
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Deep mendelian randomization: Investigating the causal knowledge of genomic deep learning models

  2022cited by this paper
• Detecting heterogeneous treatment effects with instrumental variables and application to the Oregon health insurance experiment

  2022cited by this paper
• Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods

  2022cited by this paper
• Instrumental variable estimation of truncated local average treatment effects

  2021cited by this paper
• Ten simple rules for conducting a mendelian randomization study

  2021cited by this paper
• Evaluating the relationship between alcohol consumption, tobacco use, and cardiovascular disease: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study

  2020cited by this paper
• Generalizing experimental results by leveraging knowledge of mechanisms

  2020cited by this paper
• Life Course Adiposity and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Mendelian Randomization Study

  2020cited by this paper
• The challenging interpretation of instrumental variable estimates under monotonicity.

  2018cited by this paper
• Mendelian Randomization: Methods for using Genetic Variants in Causal Estimation S. Burgess and S. G. Thompson, 2015 Boca Raton, Chapman and Hall–CRC xiv + 210 pp $62.95 ISBN 978‐1‐466‐57317‐8

  2018cited by this paper
• Childhood BMI and Adult Type 2 Diabetes, Coronary Artery Diseases, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cardiometabolic Traits: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

  2018cited by this paper
• The causal effects of alcohol on lipoprotein subfraction and triglyceride levels using a Mendelian randomization analysis: The Nagahama study.

  2017cited by this paper
• Two-Sample Instrumental Variable Analyses Using Heterogeneous Samples

  2017cited by this paper
• Variation in PCSK9 and HMGCR and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes.

  2016cited by this paper
• A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization

  2015cited by this paper
• Instrumental variable methods for causal inference

  2014cited by this paper
• On Instrumental Variables Estimation of Causal Odds Ratios

  2011cited by this paper
• Instruments for Causal Inference: An Epidemiologist's Dream?

  2006cited by this paper
• Probabilities of causation: Bounds and identification

  2000cited by this paper
• Probabilities Of Causation: Three Counterfactual Interpretations And Their Identification

  1999cited by this paper
• Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment Intensity

  1995cited by this paper
• Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects

  1994cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.