This research sought to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness of two distinct training approaches—low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) and high-load resistance training (HL-RT)—in managing chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) among female college students outside athletic disciplines. Thirty patients each comprised the LL-BFRT and HL-RT groups, which were randomized and subjected to an 8-week program. Results showed that both groups experienced notable improvements in visual analogue scale (VAS) and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) scores (P<0.05), with the LL-BFRT group showing extremely significant improvements (P<0.001). Isokinetic muscle strength tests showed that both groups had improved peak torque of trunk flexor and extensor muscles at 30°/s and 90°/s angular velocities. Among them, the LL-BFRT group had a more significant improvement in the flexor-to-extensor strength ratio (F/E) at 90°/s (P<0.05). Endurance testing revealed a notable boost in trunk extensor stamina across both groups (P<0.05). Results showed that low-load blood restriction training (LL-BFRT) is as effective as high-load resistance training (HL-RT) for reducing low back pain. enhancing functional ability, and fortifying trunk muscles, with certain measures showing even greater improvements. It can serve as a safe and effective alternative to HL-RT, offering a new option for the rehabilitation of CNSLBP patients.
Randomized Controlled Trial: Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Female University Students with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Jing Tang,Shih-Min Tang,Daoguang Feng
Published 2025 in Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research
- Publication date
2025-09-11
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-12 of 12 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1