Effectiveness of prehabilitation for patients with colorectal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Updates in Surgery

• Publication date

  2026-01-06

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s13304-025-02451-3PMID 41495596
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials on the role of prehabilitation programs in colorectal surgery.

  2024cited by this paper
• Effect of Preoperative Lifestyle Management and Prehabilitation on Postoperative Capability of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2024cited by this paper
• Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.

  2023cited by this paper
• Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Influence of Psychosocial Factors

  2023cited by this paper
• Does a multimodal prehabilitation program improve sleep quality and duration in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer? Pilot randomized control trial

  2023cited by this paper
• Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation on Reducing Postoperative Complications and Enhancing Functional Capacity Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The PREHAB Randomized Clinical Trial.

  2023cited by this paper
• GRADE Concept Article 5: Addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis.

  2023cited by this paper
• Home-based prehabilitation improves physical conditions measured by ergospirometry and 6MWT in colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled pilot study

  2023cited by this paper
• The effect of prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  2022cited by this paper
• Percutaneous Radiology Gastrostomy (PRG)-Associated Complications at a Tertiary Hospital over the Last 25 Years

  2022cited by this paper
• Efficacy of Prehabilitation Before Cardiac Surgery

  2022cited by this paper
• Preoperative nutritional support for patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery - does it really work?

  2022cited by this paper
• Prehabilitation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery fails to confer reduction in overall morbidity: results of a single-center, blinded, randomized controlled trial

  2022cited by this paper
• Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review.

  2022cited by this paper
• Mapping psychosocial interventions in familial colorectal cancer: a rapid systematic review

  2022cited by this paper
• Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.

  2022cited by this paper
• A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of web-based psychosocial interventions among patients with colorectal cancer.

  2022cited by this paper
• Perioperative Nutritional Support: A Review of Current Literature

  2022cited by this paper
• Bayesian models for aggregate and individual patient data component network meta‐analysis

  2022cited by this paper
• Effects of Community-based Exercise Prehabilitation for Patients Scheduled for Colorectal Surgery With High Risk for Postoperative Complications: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

  2021cited by this paper
• Effect of home-based prehabilitation in an enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

  2021cited by this paper
• Translating Evidence to Optimize Patient Care Using GRADE.

  2021cited by this paper
• Interventions to Reduce Hospital Length of Stay in High-risk Populations

  2021cited by this paper
• Bayesian Multilevel Single Case Models using 'Stan'. A new tool to study single cases in Neuropsychology.

  2020cited by this paper
• Prehabilitation for the Anesthesiologist

  2020cited by this paper
• The effect of trimodal prehabilitation on the physical and psychological health of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a randomised clinical trial

  2020cited by this paper
• Could ketogenic diet “starve” cancer? Emerging evidence

  2020cited by this paper
• Characterization of Models for Identifying Physical and Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2020cited by this paper
• Making patients fit for surgery: introducing a four pillar multimodal prehabilitation program in colorectal cancer.

  2019cited by this paper
• Feasibility of a novel exercise prehabilitation programme in patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

  2019cited by this paper
• Using the 6‐minute walk test to predict disability‐free survival after major surgery

  2019cited by this paper
• Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis.

  2018cited by this paper
• Effects of Nutritional Prehabilitation, With and Without Exercise, on Outcomes of Patients Who Undergo Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

  2018cited by this paper
• A systematic review of prehabilitation programs in abdominal cancer surgery.

  2017cited by this paper
• Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review

  2017cited by this paper
• Prehabilitation with Whey Protein Supplementation on Perioperative Functional Exercise Capacity in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Resection for Cancer: A Pilot Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

  2016cited by this paper
• The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations

  2015cited by this paper
• PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews

  2014cited by this paper
• Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for prevention of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of 72,128 patients.

  2013cited by this paper
• Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression‡

  2012cited by this paper
• GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias).

  2011cited by this paper
• GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.

  2011cited by this paper
• GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness.

  2011cited by this paper
• GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision.

  2011cited by this paper
• GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.

  2011cited by this paper
• An unblinded randomised controlled trial of preoperative oral supplements in colorectal cancer patients.

  2011cited by this paper
• GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  2008cited by this paper
• Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.

  2006cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.