Fairness as a bridge: How different types of social trust shape the evaluation of grassroots government governance in rural China

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

• Publication date

  2026-01-06

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1057/s41599-025-06456-6
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Exploring the Horizontal Dimension of Political Trust in China

  2025cited by this paper
• Local government performance: promoting trust in local government and reducing trust gap

  2024cited by this paper
• Measuring particularized trust: A name generator approach

  2023cited by this paper
• Ecological Awareness, Policy Perception, and Green Production Behaviors of Farmers Living in or near Protected Areas

  2023cited by this paper
• The Extension of Particularized Trust to Generalized Trust: The Moderating Role of Long-term Versus Short-term Orientation

  2023cited by this paper
• Börzel, Tanja, und Thomas Risse (2021): Effective Governance Under Anarchy. Institutions, Legitimacy, and Social Trust in Areas of Limited Statehood

  2023cited by this paper
• The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity

  2022cited by this paper
• Effective Governance Under Anarchy

  2021cited by this paper
• Political Consequences of Income Inequality: Assessing the Relationship Between Perceived Distributive Fairness and Political Efficacy in Asia

  2021cited by this paper
• A Meta‐Analysis of the Government Performance—Trust Link: Taking Cultural and Methodological Factors into Account

  2021cited by this paper
• Procedures Matter: Strong Voice, Evaluations of Policy Performance, and Regime Support

  2020cited by this paper
• The Extension of Particularized Trust to Generalized and Out-Group Trust: The Constraining Role of Collectivism

  2019cited by this paper
• The Oxford handbook of social and political trust

  2019cited by this paper
• Local–national political trust patterns: Why China is an exception

  2018cited by this paper
• Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity

  2018cited by this paper
• Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity

  2018cited by this paper
• Government Trust, Social Trust, and Citizens’ Risk Concerns: Evidence from Crisis Management in China

  2018cited by this paper
• Sources of Local Political Trust in Rural China

  2017cited by this paper
• The Reputational Consequences of Generalized Trust

  2017cited by this paper
• From the general to the specific: How social trust motivates relational trust.

  2016cited by this paper
• Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy?: Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union

  2016cited by this paper
• Changes in Inequality and Generalized Trust in Europe

  2015cited by this paper
• Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America.

  2015cited by this paper
• Social trust and grassroots governance in rural China.

  2015cited by this paper
• Trust Primacy

  2013cited by this paper
• Public Participation, Procedural Fairness, and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty

  2012cited by this paper
• Social Trust: Fairness Matters More Than Homogeneity

  2012cited by this paper
• In the eyes of the beholder? The role of dispositional trust in judgments of procedural and interactional fairness

  2012cited by this paper
• Does Management Performance Impact Citizen Satisfaction?

  2012cited by this paper
• The influence of decision power on distributive fairness

  2011cited by this paper
• The Rise and Routinization of Social Capital, 1988-2008

  2010cited by this paper
• Adjusting for Perception Bias in Citizens' Subjective Evaluations

  2010cited by this paper
• The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects.

  2010cited by this paper
• Citizens' Satisfaction with Government Performance in Six Asian-Pacific Giants

  2010cited by this paper
• A characterization of trust, and its consequences

  2009cited by this paper
• Views of Chinese Citizens on Current Inequalities

  2009cited by this paper
• What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything?

  2008cited by this paper
• Understanding Governance: Ten Years On

  2007cited by this paper
• Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

  2007cited by this paper
• Decomposing Income Inequality and Policy Implications in Rural China

  2007cited by this paper
• Investigating the Roots of Civic Morality: Trust, Social Capital, and Institutional Performance

  2006cited by this paper
• Social Trust and the Management of Risk

  2006cited by this paper
• Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to:

  2006cited by this paper
• Changing regional rural inequality in China 1980-2002

  2006cited by this paper
• Making Democracy Work More? Exploring the Linkage between Social Capital and Government Performance

  2006cited by this paper
• Organizing consent: The role of procedural fairness in political trust and compliance

  2006cited by this paper
• All for One: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust

  2005cited by this paper
• What Is the Role of Trust in Organizational Justice

  2005cited by this paper
• Political Trust in Rural China

  2004cited by this paper
• Complexity and demographic stability in population models.

  2004cited by this paper
• Weapons of the Weak

  2004cited by this paper
• Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law

  2003cited by this paper
• The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing

  2003cited by this paper
• applying the concepts of bonding and bridging social capital to empirical research

  2003cited by this paper
• Social Capital and Government Performance

  2002cited by this paper
• Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory.

  2001cited by this paper
• Social capital, civil society and development

  2001cited by this paper
• Justice for all? Progress in Research on Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Distributive and Procedural Justice

  2000cited by this paper
• Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the U.S. States

  2000cited by this paper
• Political Performance and Institutional Trust

  1999cited by this paper
• Social capital, institutional structures, and democratic performance: A comparative study of German local governments

  1999cited by this paper
• Public Officials' Attitudes toward Subjective Performance Measures

  1999cited by this paper
• Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance

  1998cited by this paper
• The New Governance: Governing without Government

  1996cited by this paper
• Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order

  1996cited by this paper
• Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity

  1996cited by this paper
• Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America

  1995cited by this paper
• Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.

  1994cited by this paper
• Linking Objective and Subjective Measures of Performance

  1984cited by this paper
• Urban Policy Making and Subjective Service Evaluations: Are They Compatible?

  1982cited by this paper
• Polyarchy; participation and opposition

  1971cited by this paper
• Making democracy work

  1941cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.