Gender bias in panel scores and in grant success: reanalyzing ‘sexism and nepotism in peer review’ by Wennerås and Wold

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Scientometrics

• Publication date

  2026-01-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11192-025-05532-7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Is there gender bias in awarding cum laude for the PhD thesis?

  2024cited by this paper
• Bibliometric indicators as items

  2023cited by this paper
• Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment

  2023cited by this paper
• Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration

  2023cited by this paper
• Gender-equal funding rates conceal unequal evaluations

  2022cited by this paper
• Do interests affect grant application success? The role of organizational proximity

  2022influential reference
• Judgment

  2022cited by this paper
• Gender differences in research grant allocation - a mixed picture

  2022influential reference
• Gender, Family and Caregiving Leave, and Advancement in Academic Science: Effects across the Life Course

  2021cited by this paper
• San Francisco declaration on research assessment

  2020cited by this paper
• Grant Allocation Disparities from a Gender Perspective: Literature Review. Synthesis Report

  2020cited by this paper
• The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions

  2020cited by this paper
• Gender Stereotypes.

  2018cited by this paper
• Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact

  2017cited by this paper
• Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine

  2016cited by this paper
• Reply to Volker and Steenbeek: Multiple indicators point toward gender disparities in grant funding success in The Netherlands

  2015cited by this paper
• Reply to Albers: Acceptance of empirical evidence for gender disparities in Dutch research funding

  2015cited by this paper
• No evidence that gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands: A reaction to van der Lee and Ellemers

  2015cited by this paper
• Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands

  2015cited by this paper
• Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

  2015cited by this paper
• Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson’s paradox

  2015cited by this paper
• Different views on scholarly talent: What are the talents we are looking for in science?

  2014cited by this paper
• The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels

  2014cited by this paper
• Women in Academic Science

  2014cited by this paper
• Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator

  2012influential reference
• Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

  2011cited by this paper
• Panel peer review of grant applications: what do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decision-making in groups?

  2010cited by this paper
• Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals

  2009cited by this paper
• Persistent nepotism in peer-review

  2008cited by this paper
• Gender and productivity differentials in science

  2004cited by this paper
• Sex differences in research productivity : New evidence about an old puzzle

  1998cited by this paper
• Gender Differences in the Rewards to Publishing in Academe: Science in the 1970s

  1998cited by this paper
• Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

  1997cited by this paper
• Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity

  1996cited by this paper
• Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity

  1992cited by this paper
• Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science.

  1987cited by this paper
• Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.