The empowerment paradox: a cognitive-affective system model of fostering and subverting employee ambidexterity in the digital era

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Current Psychology

• Publication date

  2026-01-19

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s12144-025-08982-7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Family matters! Antecedents and boundary conditions of unethical pro-family behaviors

  2024cited by this paper
• Precision marketing for financial industry using a PU-learning recommendation method

  2023cited by this paper
• Selling through online marketplaces with consumer profiling

  2023cited by this paper
• Tackling grand societal challenges: Understanding when and how reverse engineering fosters frugal product innovation in an emerging market

  2023cited by this paper
• The definition and measurement of human capital resources: A content and meta-analytic review.

  2023cited by this paper
• Handbook on HR Process ResearchSandars, K., Yang, H., & Charmi, P. (Eds.). (2021, p. 224) Edward Elgar Publishing, $46.52 paperback

  2023cited by this paper
• Rethinking business performance in global value chains

  2022cited by this paper
• Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook

  2021cited by this paper
• Design Thinking as Sensemaking – Developing a Pragmatist Theory of Practice to (re)introduce Sensibility

  2021cited by this paper
• From zero to hero: An exploratory study examining sudden hero status among nonphysician health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  2020cited by this paper
• Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research

  2020cited by this paper
• Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions

  2020cited by this paper
• When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

  2019influential reference
• Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World

  2017cited by this paper
• A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

  2015influential reference
• Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach

  2015cited by this paper
• A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)

  2013cited by this paper
• Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility.

  2012cited by this paper
• Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

  2012cited by this paper
• Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context

  2011cited by this paper
• The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument Development and Estimates of Reliability and Validity

  2010cited by this paper
• Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators

  2008cited by this paper
• The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity

  2007cited by this paper
• Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory.

  2007cited by this paper
• Investigating Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows

  2006cited by this paper
• The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies

  2003cited by this paper
• Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

  1999influential reference
• PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION

  1995influential reference
• A New Measure of Cognitive Flexibility

  1995cited by this paper
• A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.

  1995influential reference
• Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects

  1986influential reference
• The wording and translation of research instruments.

  1986cited by this paper
• Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.

  1981cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.