Using machine learning to segment investor behaviour

Investors saving for retirement have an unfortunate tendency to switch investments (more so in volatile periods), which leads to worse ex-post investment return outcomes – the “behaviour tax”. This paper uses machine learning clustering algorithms to better understand this behaviour. It improves the clustering efficacy of a previous study by Nixon and Gilbert (2022) in several ways: by using a different clustering algorithm (k-means), adding a new variable (portfolio drawdowns) to the feature set, using a large new dataset of investor switching behaviour which includes a period of extreme investment volatility (2020) and clustering on six separate calendar years (instead of only a pooled sample). The seven behavioural clusters identified are more clearly defined with different levels of behaviour tax or value eroded by switching between mutual funds. The algorithm organically differentiates the population into different groupings of investors, each incurring different levels of behaviour tax. (1) We don’t know whether the switch was initiated by the adviser or the client. (2) We don’t know in all cases whether the switch is behavioural in nature (i.e. not as a result of a changing goal). There are no causal relationships between the behaviour and feature set, only correlational. Financial services firms using this methodology can more effectively segment their customer bases, allowing for more personalised engagement. This research deals with a large customer database, which lends itself to the application of machine learning techniques to better understand customer behaviour. In doing so, more effective and personalised engagement is possible and manage/reduce/eliminate the behaviour tax.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Review of Behavioral Finance

• Publication date

  2026-01-26

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1108/rbf-07-2025-0307
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Using Machine Learning to Predict Investors’ Switching Behaviour

  2024cited by this paper
• Unsupervised machine learning to reveal South African risk behaviour archetypes in the domain of discretionary investment decisions

  2022cited by this paper
• Influence of risk propensity, behavioural biases and demographic factors on equity investors' risk perception

  2022cited by this paper
• Recommendation Product Based on Customer Categorization with K-Means Clustering Method

  2019cited by this paper
• Switching Costs and Competition in Retirement Investment

  2019cited by this paper
• Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning

  2018cited by this paper
• Understanding Perceived Risk: 1978–2015

  2016cited by this paper
• Failing to Choose the Best Price: Theory, Evidence, and Policy

  2015cited by this paper
• The Effect of Providing Peer Information on Retirement Savings Decisions.

  2011cited by this paper
• Risk as Feelings

  2009cited by this paper
• Investigating risk perception: a short introduction

  2004cited by this paper
• Probability Neglect: Emotions, Worst Cases, and Law

  2002cited by this paper
• Do Investors Trade Too Much ?

  2000cited by this paper
• Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice

  1997cited by this paper
• Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior

  1992cited by this paper
• Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

  1992cited by this paper
• Rational and personal aspects of risk

  1980cited by this paper
• Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.

  1972cited by this paper
• Psychological Study of Human Judgment: Implications for Investment Decision-Making

  1972cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.