The mismatch between cyclists' perceived safety and actual crash risk in mixed-traffic environments is a critical yet underexplored issue in road safety research. While prior studies have focused on static environmental factors, they often overlook the real-time influence of dynamic visual stimuli on risk perception. To address this gap, this study developed a multisource-integrated virtual reality (VR) experimental platform that synchronously captured millisecond-level electroencephalography (EEG) signals from 72 participants, built environment (BE) features, and time-to-collision (TTC) data from VISSIM microsimulation. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model was used to examine how mismatches emerge between perceived safety and crash risk. Results reveal a 'perceptual relief period' after being overtaken, where cyclists exhibit higher perceived safety despite persistent threats from following vehicles, creating a potentially hazardous temporal window. This mismatch effect is further amplified in environments characterized by high spatial enclosure, complex visual textures, dense vegetation, and low visible vehicle density. These findings suggest that BE features intended to enhance aesthetic appeal or reduce stress may inadvertently impair cyclists' ability to perceive risk in high-conflict areas. This study offers empirical support for an integrated human-vehicle-environment safety framework and calls for interdisciplinary collaboration between neuroscience and transport engineering in the design of safer mobility systems.
When feeling safe becomes risky: A VR-EEG-computer vision framework for analyzing cyclist safety in dynamic traffic environment.
Lurong Xu,Tengfeng Lin,Steve O’Hern,Alexa Delbosc,Zhuo Chen,Inhi Kim,Shuli Luo
Published 2026 in Accident Analysis and Prevention
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2026
- Venue
Accident Analysis and Prevention
- Publication date
2026-01-31
- Fields of study
Medicine, Computer Science, Engineering, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-87 of 87 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1