Renewal theory for a run-and-tumble particle with stochastic resetting and a sticky boundary

We consider a run-and-tumble particle (RTP) with stochastic resetting confined to the half line $[0,\infty)$ with a sticky boundary at $x=0$. In the bulk the RTP tumbles at a constant rate $\alpha>0$ between velocity states $\pm v$ with $v>0$ and randomly resets to its initial position and orientation $(x_0,k_0)\in(\mathbb{R}^+,\pm)$. When the RTP reaches the target at $x=0$ it attaches to the boundary for a random waiting time before either detaching and continuing to navigate the bulk domain or (permanently) entering the target. These events are the analogs of adsorption, desorption, and absorption of a particle by a partially reactive surface in physical chemistry. We use renewal theory to characterize the particle trajectory in terms of successive binding events under two distinct desorption protocols: via resetting to $(x_0,k_0)$ and via continuous movement from $x=0$ with velocity $+v$. First we derive the nonequilibrum stationary state (NESS) in the case of no absorption and characterize the accumulation at the boundary. Second, we compute the mean first passage time (MFPT) statistics. In addition to observing the usual unimodal dependence of the MFPT on bulk resetting, both the NESS and MFPT strongly depend on the initial orientation $k_0$ and the desorption protocol. For instance, if the initial orientation is toward the boundary, we find that the desorption-induced resetting protocol can reduce the MFPT more effectively than the non-resetting desorption protocol. We also show how matching the desorption kinetics with the bulk resetting or tumbling rate introduces a trade-off between minimizing the adsorption and absorption times. In this setting we find that the desorption protocol which minimizes the absorption MFPT for a given set of parameters is almost always the opposite of that favored when desorption and bulk kinetics are not the same.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2026-02-02

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Physics

• Identifiers
  arXiv 2602.02446
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Random search with stochastic resetting: When finding the target is not enough.

  2025influential reference
• Run-and-tumble particle with diffusion: boundary local times and the zero-diffusion limit

  2025cited by this paper
• Stochastic 1D search-and-capture as a G/M/c queueing model

  2025cited by this paper
• Encounter-based model of a run-and-tumble particle with stochastic resetting

  2025cited by this paper
• Diffusion-mediated adsorption versus absorption at partially reactive targets: a renewal approach

  2025influential reference
• Cover times with stochastic resetting.

  2024cited by this paper
• Stochastic calculus of run-and-tumble motion: an applied perspective

  2024cited by this paper
• Escape of a sticky particle

  2023cited by this paper
• Encounter-based model of a run-and-tumble particle II: absorption at sticky boundaries

  2023cited by this paper
• Diffusion-controlled reactions with non-Markovian binding/unbinding kinetics.

  2023cited by this paper
• One-dimensional run-and-tumble motions with generic boundary conditions

  2023cited by this paper
• Occupation time of a run-and-tumble particle with resetting.

  2020cited by this paper
• Run-and-tumble particles in two dimensions under stochastic resetting conditions

  2020cited by this paper
• Run-and-tumble particle in one-dimensional confining potentials: Steady-state, relaxation, and first-passage properties.

  2018cited by this paper
• Run and tumble particle under resetting: a renewal approach

  2018cited by this paper
• Steady state, relaxation and first-passage properties of a run-and-tumble particle in one-dimension

  2017cited by this paper
• Active Particles in Complex and Crowded Environments

  2016cited by this paper
• The Mechanics and Statistics of Active Matter

  2010cited by this paper
• Collective Motion

  1999cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.