Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for diagnosing benign, borderline, and malignant adnexal masses.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  npj Precision Oncology

• Publication date

  2026-02-03

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/s41698-026-01320-5PMID 41634163PMCID PMC12976284
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• International multicenter validation of AI-driven ultrasound detection of ovarian cancer

  2025cited by this paper
• Deep Learning Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced US Images for Adnexal Lesion Classification.

  2025cited by this paper
• A multimodal uncertainty-aware AI system optimizes ovarian cancer risk assessment workflow

  2025cited by this paper
• Advancing AI Interpretability in Medical Imaging: A Comparative Analysis of Pixel-Level Interpretability and Grad-CAM Models

  2025cited by this paper
• Machine learning and radiomics for segmentation and classification of adnexal masses on ultrasound

  2024cited by this paper
• Development and validation of a deep learning pipeline to diagnose ovarian masses using ultrasound screening: a retrospective multicenter study

  2024cited by this paper
• Machine learning models in evaluating the malignancy risk of ovarian tumors: a comparative study

  2024cited by this paper
• An explainable machine learning model to solid adnexal masses diagnosis based on clinical data and qualitative ultrasound indicators

  2024cited by this paper
• Assessing the Efficacy of Synthetic Optic Disc Images for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Deep Learning

  2024cited by this paper
• Radiomics analysis of ultrasound images to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid morphology on ultrasound

  2024cited by this paper
• TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods

  2024cited by this paper
• Development and validation of an interpretable model integrating multimodal information for improving ovarian cancer diagnosis

  2024cited by this paper
• Multi-modality deep learning model reaches high prediction accuracy in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

  2024cited by this paper
• Generalizability and Diagnostic Performance of AI Models for Thyroid US.

  2023cited by this paper
• A Comprehensive Review of Screening Methods for Ovarian Masses: Towards Earlier Detection

  2023cited by this paper
• Using Radiomics and Machine Learning Applied to MRI to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

  2023cited by this paper
• MTANet: Multi-Task Attention Network for Automatic Medical Image Segmentation and Classification

  2023cited by this paper
• Prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors using Resnet34 on ultrasound images

  2023cited by this paper
• A survey of barriers and facilitators to ultrasound use in low- and middle-income countries

  2023cited by this paper
• Deep Learning Prediction of Ovarian Malignancy at US Compared with O-RADS and Expert Assessment.

  2022cited by this paper
• A Deep Learning Model System for Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses

  2022cited by this paper
• Deep learning-enabled pelvic ultrasound images for accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer in China: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.

  2022cited by this paper
• Using rADioMIcs and machine learning with ultrasonography for the differential diagnosis of myometRiAL tumors (the ADMIRAL pilot study). Radiomics and differential diagnosis of myometrial tumors.

  2021cited by this paper
• Application of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Discriminating Benign, Borderline, and Malignant Serous Ovarian Tumors From Ultrasound Images

  2021cited by this paper
• Deep Learning Techniques for Fatty Liver Using Multi-View Ultrasound Images Scanned by Different Scanners: Development and Validation Study

  2021cited by this paper
• PVT v2: Improved baselines with Pyramid Vision Transformer

  2021cited by this paper
• Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2021cited by this paper
• Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model to assist thyroid nodule diagnosis and management: a multicentre diagnostic study.

  2021cited by this paper
• ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors

  2021cited by this paper
• Ultrasound image analysis using deep neural networks for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors: comparison with expert subjective assessment

  2020cited by this paper
• The Adoption of Radiomics and machine learning improves the diagnostic processes of women with Ovarian MAsses (the AROMA pilot study)

  2020cited by this paper
• Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study

  2020cited by this paper
• Guideline No. 403: Initial Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses.

  2020cited by this paper
• Borderline epithelial ovarian tumors: what the radiologist should know

  2020cited by this paper
• New sonographic marker of borderline ovarian tumor: microcystic pattern of papillae and solid components

  2019cited by this paper
• O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee.

  2019cited by this paper
• Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications

  2019cited by this paper
• The impact of clinicopathologic and surgical factors on relapse and pregnancy in young patients (≤40 years old) with borderline ovarian tumors

  2018cited by this paper
• Imaging in gynecological disease (12): clinical and ultrasound features of invasive and non‐invasive malignant serous ovarian tumors

  2017cited by this paper
• A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass

  2017cited by this paper
• Imaging in gynecological disease (11): clinical and ultrasound features of mucinous ovarian tumors

  2017cited by this paper
• Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay

  2017cited by this paper
• Ultrasound Image Discrimination between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses Based on a Neural Network Approach.

  2016cited by this paper
• Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses.

  2016cited by this paper
• Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization

  2016cited by this paper
• Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015

  2016cited by this paper
• Ultrasound diagnosis of serous surface papillary borderline ovarian tumor: A case series with a review of the literature

  2015cited by this paper
• The Factors Predicting Recurrence in Patients With Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumor

  2015cited by this paper
• Safety of ovarian conservation and fertility preservation in advanced borderline ovarian tumors.

  2015cited by this paper
• Conservative surgery in ovarian borderline tumours: a meta-analysis with emphasis on recurrence risk.

  2015cited by this paper
• [Introduction of WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs, fourth edition].

  2014cited by this paper
• Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study

  2014cited by this paper
• Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System

  2009cited by this paper
• Simple ultrasound‐based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

  2008cited by this paper
• Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond

  2008cited by this paper
• Inclusion of CA-125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors.

  2007cited by this paper
• Fertility and recurrence results of conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors.

  2005cited by this paper
• Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group

  2000cited by this paper
• Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience

  1999cited by this paper
• A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer

  1991cited by this paper
• A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer

  1990cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.