Assessment of Vegetation Index Saturation Based on Vertically Stratified Aboveground Biomass in Temperate Meadow Steppe

Yuli Shi,Yidi Wang,Yiqing Hao,Cong Xu,Fangwen Yang,Z. Bai,Dan Zhao,Xiaohua Zhu,Wei Liu

Published 2026 in Remote Sensing

ABSTRACT

Grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) is a key indicator of grassland ecosystem structure and function, and its accurate monitoring is of great importance for assessing grassland ecological conditions and supporting sustainable grassland management. Traditional biomass estimation methods based on vegetation indices (VIs) often suffer from saturation due to canopy shading. However, comparative studies on VI saturation and the saturation height of AGB detectable by different indices remain limited. In this study, we evaluated 12 commonly used VIs based on field-measured AGB and hyperspectral data in the Hulunbuir meadow steppe. Relationships between vertically accumulated biomass and VIs were analyzed to identify optimal AGB fitting models and to determine the saturation height of each index. Results showed that vertical distribution of AGB followed a unimodal pattern, with biomass peaking at approximately 36 cm in this region. This study employed four models (namely the Linear model, the Logarithmic model, the Power Function model and the Gompertz model) to fit the relationship between the vegetation index and AGB. Among them, Gompertz models consistently outperformed other models, indicating saturation across all indices. Based on saturation height, the 12 VIs were classified into two groups: ARVI, GNDVI, NDRE, OSAVI, and SAVI saturated at 40 cm, whereas DVI, EVI, MSAVI, NDPI, NDVI, RVI, and VARI maintained sensitivity up to 50 cm, demonstrating a stronger anti-saturation capacity. NDVI and NDPI exhibited the highest fitting accuracy and resistance to saturation. These findings validate the saturation limitations of VIs and provide guidance for selecting appropriate indices to improve the accuracy of grassland biomass retrieval.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-49 of 49 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

  • No citing papers are available for this paper.

Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1