Conflicting Emotions, Environmental and Political Factors in Support for Local Environmental Morality Policies: Evidence From an Experiment on Wild Boars in Haifa

Can emotional responses help explain public support for local environmental morality policies? As cities increasingly contend with complex interspecies conflicts in densely populated urban settings, understanding the drivers of policy support becomes essential. While previous research has emphasized environmental perceptions and political orientations, this study introduces a novel psychological dimension: emotional responses toward urban wildlife. Emotions are not simply background noise to be managed—they are structured, meaningful appraisals that influence how individuals interpret their surroundings and evaluate policy choices. This article examines the case of wild boars in Haifa, Israel, where municipal efforts to manage human–wildlife relations have generated prolonged tensions among residents, officials, and advocacy groups. We conducted a large‐scale survey experiment in which respondents were randomly assigned to visual treatments—photographic stimuli designed to evoke specific emotions such as fear versus empathy and indifference versus curiosity. Participants then reported their level of support for two policies: the thinning of wild boars and the regulation of public feeding. Findings show that emotional responses significantly predict support for both policies, beyond the effects of political ideology and environmental concern. Moreover, certain emotional reactions can substitute for perceived ecological harm in shaping policy preferences—suggesting the presence of affective‐political compensation mechanisms. This study expands existing models of environmental policy support by integrating affective cognition as a central explanatory factor. It contributes to a growing interdisciplinary literature that views local governance not merely as institutional design, but as a socio‐emotional arena where competing moral, ecological, and political claims are negotiated.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Environmental Policy and Governance

• Publication date

  2026-02-18

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/eet.70043
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Emotions and political identity predict public acceptance of urban deer management

  2025cited by this paper
• Anthropocentric or Biocentric? Socio-Cultural, Environmental, and Political Drivers of Urban Wildlife Signage Preferences and Sustainable Coexistence

  2025cited by this paper
• The effect of human-wildlife interaction and political factors on support for local environmental morality policies: Thinning, trap–neuter–return and regulation against wild-animals’ feeders

  2025cited by this paper
• Influence of human emotions on conservation attitudes toward relevant wildlife species in El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Mexico

  2024cited by this paper
• Urban conflict management, human‐wild animal interactions, local environmental governance and political participation

  2024cited by this paper
• Pervasive failure to report properties of visual stimuli in experimental research in psychology and neuroscience: Two metascientific studies.

  2023cited by this paper
• Does regional collaborative governance reduce air pollution? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

  2023cited by this paper
• Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts.

  2023cited by this paper
• Animals in the Study of Public Administration

  2022cited by this paper
• Human-Animal Studies in Israel: A Field in the Making

  2022cited by this paper
• Animals in the city: Wither the human-animal divide

  2022cited by this paper
• Animals and urban gentrification: Displacement and injustice in the trans-species city

  2021cited by this paper
• Leashing the City: Dog-Leash-Human Entanglements and the Urban Space

  2021cited by this paper
• Observation of rescue behaviour in wild boar (Sus scrofa)

  2021cited by this paper
• Animal Cognition in an Urbanised World

  2021cited by this paper
• The Impact of Training on Druze Entrepreneurs’ Attitudes Towards and Intended Behaviors Regarding Local Sustainability Governance: A Field Experiment at the Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve

  2020cited by this paper
• Predicting Responses to Climate Change Health Impact Messages From Political Ideology and Health Status: Cognitive Appraisals and Emotional Reactions as Mediators

  2020cited by this paper
• A long-term and comprehensive assessment of urbanization-induced impacts on ecosystem services in the capital city of India

  2020cited by this paper
• Beliefs, perceived risks and acceptability of lethal management of wild pigs

  2020cited by this paper
• Who owns the future city? Phases of technological urbanism and shifts in sovereignty

  2020cited by this paper
• Morality Politics in a Secular Age

  2019cited by this paper
• Public trust thinking and public ownership of wildlife in Italy and the United States

  2019cited by this paper
• Local ecological knowledge about human‐wildlife conflict: A Portuguese case study

  2019cited by this paper
• Building a global urban science

  2018cited by this paper
• The impact of heritage decline on urban social life

  2018cited by this paper
• Stochastic assessment of management strategies for a Mediterranean peri-urban wild boar population

  2018cited by this paper
• Why We Hate

  2018cited by this paper
• A review on political factors influencing public support for urban environmental policy

  2017cited by this paper
• Between Remembering and Forgetting the Years of Political Violence: Psychosocial Impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Peru

  2017cited by this paper
• Iron Age Pigs: New Evidence on Their Origin and Role in Forming Identity Boundaries

  2015cited by this paper
• Meta-Analysis of Attitudes toward Damage-Causing Mammalian Wildlife

  2014cited by this paper
• The Historical Dynamics of Social–Ecological Traps

  2014cited by this paper
• Outdoor cats: Identifying differences between stakeholder beliefs, perceived impacts, risk and management

  2013cited by this paper
• Personally Relevant Climate Change

  2013cited by this paper
• Should We Care About the Needs of Non-humans? Needs Assessment: A Tool for Environmental Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Organization of Living Beings

  2011cited by this paper
• The Central Role of Group-Based Hatred as an Emotional Antecedent of Political Intolerance: Evidence from Israel

  2009cited by this paper
• A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change

  2008cited by this paper
• Global Environmental Governance: Taking Stock, Moving Forward

  2008cited by this paper
• The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona's White Mountains

  2008cited by this paper
• The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature

  2007cited by this paper
• Living with Problem Animals—Self-Reported Fear of Potentially Dangerous Species in the Serengeti Region, Tanzania

  2006cited by this paper
• The Domestication of Anger

  2004cited by this paper
• Media’s social construction of environmental issues: focus on global warming – a comparative study

  2003cited by this paper
• Pastoral, Progressive and Postmodern Ideas in Environmental Political Thought: Restoring Agency to Nature

  2001cited by this paper
• Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions

  2001cited by this paper
• Are You Being Served? The Responsiveness of Public Administration to Citizens’ Demands: An Empirical Examination in Israel

  2000cited by this paper
• Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims

  2000cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.