Accurate vehicle trajectory prediction at signalized inter-sections is critical for autonomous driving safety, yet remains challenging due to complex vehicle-signal interactions and stringent real-time requirements. This paper proposes chain-of-thought (CoT)-intersection vehicle trajectory predict, a novel framework that integrates CoT prompting with lightweight knowledge distillation to achieve high-precision, explainable trajectory forecasting. We use structured CoT prompts to explicitly encode traffic rules and right-of-way logic into GPT-4 Turbo's reasoning process, mitigating rule agnosticism, and we employ dynamic knowledge distillation to transfer LLM capabilities into a compact Qwen-1.5 model. The framework employs a causal spatio-temporal fusion network that integrates distilled semantic features with kinematic data while preventing future information leakage. Evaluated on our newly released SIGNAL, CoT-intersection vehicle trajectory predict achieves: i). 0.93 m Average Displacement Error (ADE) and 1.86 m Final Displacement Error (FDE), outperforming state-of-the-art baselines like V2X-TrajNet by 23.1% and 13.5%, respectively; ii). 1.7% Signal Violation Rate (SVR) and 0.12 Conflict Severity Index (CSI), demonstrating 97.3% regulatory compliance and 72.1% collision risk reduction; iii). 28 ms inference latency on NVIDIA Jetson Orin, enabling real-time edge deployment. These advancements demonstrate the viability of lightweight, explainable LLM surrogates for safety-critical autonomous driving systems.
LLM-Driven Trajectory Prediction at Intersections with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Yanbin Liu,Guangyu Tian,Wei Zhong,Xiaojing Qi,Yiran Wang
Published 2025 in IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content
- Publication date
2025-11-07
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-16 of 16 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1