An uncertainty and conviction-aware attention model for automatically estimating reviewer confidence from peer review texts

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  International Journal of Data Science and Analysis

• Publication date

  2026-02-26

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s41060-026-01059-z
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Please be polite to your peers: a multi-task model for assessing the tone and objectivity of critiques of peer review comments

  2024cited by this paper
• PolitePEER: does peer review hurt? A dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews

  2023cited by this paper
• HedgePeer: A Dataset for Uncertainty Detection in Peer Reviews

  2022cited by this paper
• Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews

  2022cited by this paper
• Sharing is Caring! Joint Multitask Learning Helps Aspect-Category Extraction and Sentiment Detection in Scientific Peer Reviews

  2021cited by this paper
• Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?

  2021cited by this paper
• Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment

  2021cited by this paper
• Automatically detecting open academic review praise and criticism

  2020cited by this paper
• Arbitrariness in the peer review process

  2020cited by this paper
• Resolving the Scope of Speculation and Negation using Transformer-Based Architectures

  2020cited by this paper
• Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Scientific Reviews

  2020cited by this paper
• Gender Difference in Hedging: A Corpus-Based Study to TED Talks about Emotion

  2020cited by this paper
• RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

  2019cited by this paper
• NegBERT: A Transfer Learning Approach for Negation Detection and Scope Resolution

  2019cited by this paper
• Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review

  2019cited by this paper
• Argument Mining for Understanding Peer Reviews

  2019cited by this paper
• XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding

  2019cited by this paper
• CiteTracked: A Longitudinal Dataset of Peer Reviews and Citations

  2019cited by this paper
• A Sentiment Augmented Deep Architecture to Predict Peer Review Outcomes

  2019cited by this paper
• A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applications

  2018cited by this paper
• A New Method of Region Embedding for Text Classification

  2018cited by this paper
• Disconnected Recurrent Neural Networks for Text Categorization

  2018cited by this paper
• Modeling and Predicting Citation Count via Recurrent Neural Network with Long Short-Term Memory

  2018cited by this paper
• Hedging and academic writing: an analysis of lexical hedges

  2018cited by this paper
• Linguistic Hedging In The Light Of Politeness Theory

  2018cited by this paper
• Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective

  2017cited by this paper
• Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

  2017cited by this paper
• Computational support for academic peer review

  2017cited by this paper
• Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Text Classification

  2016cited by this paper
• Citation Prediction Using Diverse Features

  2015cited by this paper
• Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide

  2014cited by this paper
• Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references

  2014cited by this paper
• Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate

  2014cited by this paper
• VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text

  2014cited by this paper
• GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation

  2014cited by this paper
• Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting

  2014influential reference
• Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

  2014cited by this paper
• Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks

  2013cited by this paper
• Speculation and Negation: Rules, Rankers, and the Role of Syntax

  2012cited by this paper
• Improving Speculative Language Detection using Linguistic Knowledge

  2012cited by this paper
• Predicting speculation: a simple disambiguation approach to hedge detection in biomedical literature

  2011cited by this paper
• Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.

  2010cited by this paper
• Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study

  2010cited by this paper
• A High-Precision Approach to Detecting Hedges and their Scopes

  2010cited by this paper
• A Cascade Method for Detecting Hedges and their Scope in Natural Language Text

  2010cited by this paper
• Resolving Speculation: MaxEnt Cue Classification and Dependency-Based Scope Rules

  2010cited by this paper
• Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis; from the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics

  2010cited by this paper
• Detecting Speculations and their Scopes in Scientific Text

  2009cited by this paper
• Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis

  2009cited by this paper
• Dependency Tree Kernels for Relation Extraction

  2004cited by this paper
• Snowball: extracting relations from large plain-text collections

  2000cited by this paper
• Literature Dynamics: Studies on Growth, Diffusion, and Epidemics

  1999cited by this paper
• Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge

  1998cited by this paper
• Gender and Hedging: From Sex Differences to Situated Practice

  1997cited by this paper
• Long Short-Term Memory

  1997cited by this paper
• Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

  1990cited by this paper
• Linguistics and natural logic

  1970cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.