A Critical Reflection on the State of Data Analysis in Empirical Software Engineering

Matteo Esposito,Mikel Robredo,Murali Sridharan,G. Travassos,Rafael Peñaloza,Valentina Lenarduzzi

Published 2026 in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

ABSTRACT

Context. Empirical Software Engineering drives innovation in SE through qualitative and quantitative studies. Since the 2006 Dagstuhl seminar, concerns about methodological rigor persist. Recent studies have highlighted misconceptions in statistical practices in ESE, yet their impact on the field’s progress and verifiability remains uninvestigated. Aim. To analyze three decades of SE research to uncover flaws in statistical methods used for data analysis in empirical studies. Next, to observe the capability of current empirical software engineering experts to identify and address these issues. Method. We conducted a large-scale literature survey, collecting over 27,000 empirical SE papers. Using a Large Language Model (LLM), we categorized studies into methodologically adequate and not adequate categories, and selected 28 primary studies (14 from each category) for expert evaluation via a focus group-based workshop. Results. Our findings reveal widespread misuse of statistical methods in empirical SE studies. Additionally, experts often struggle to detect these flaws and provide proper corrections, raising concerns about methodological rigor in the field. Conclusions. This study highlights the risks of perpetuating statistical misconceptions and advocates for a critical reform in the approach to data analysis in ESE. We advocate for developing frameworks that foster methodological awareness and rigor.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2026

  • Venue

    ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

  • Publication date

    2026-02-28

  • Fields of study

    Not labeled

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-59 of 59 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

  • No citing papers are available for this paper.

Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1