The socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in managed, semi-managed and low-managed urban blue spaces and their surroundings. A case study of Warsaw, Poland

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Cities

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2026.106902
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Rewilding relationships: Principles for forging relationships in social-ecological systems

  2025cited by this paper
• Exploring citizens’ preferences for the temporal effectiveness of urban nature-based solutions through participatory GIS

  2025cited by this paper
• Leveraging Ecosystem Services and Well-Being in Urban Landscape Planning for Nature Conservation: A Case Study of Peri-Urban Dynamics

  2024cited by this paper
• Mapping cultural ecosystem services of the urban riverscapes: the case of the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland

  2024cited by this paper
• The Structure of Beauty: Informal Green Spaces in Their Users’ Eyes

  2024cited by this paper
• Everyday places to get away – Lessons learned from Covid-19 lockdowns

  2024cited by this paper
• The evolution of public participation GIS (PPGIS) barriers in spatial planning practice

  2023cited by this paper
• Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values

  2023cited by this paper
• Urban biodiversity, ecosystems and the city. Insights from 50 years of the Berlin School of urban ecology

  2023cited by this paper
• Perceptions and Patterns of Use of Blue Spaces in Selected European Cities: Tartu, Tallinn, Barcelona, Warsaw and Plymouth

  2023cited by this paper
• Developing a Multi-sensory Public Participation GIS (MSPPGIS) method for integrating landscape values and soundscapes of urban green infrastructure

  2023cited by this paper
• Innovations in Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure: Tackling local and global challenges in cities

  2022cited by this paper
• How do urban green spaces increase well-being? The role of perceived wildness and nature connectedness

  2022cited by this paper
• Using community surveys with participatory mapping to monitor comprehensive plan implementation

  2022cited by this paper
• Who benefits from urban green spaces during times of crisis? Perception and use of urban green spaces in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic

  2021cited by this paper
• Emotional Well-Being in Urban Wilderness: Assessing States of Calmness and Alertness in Informal Green Spaces (IGSs) with Muse—Portable EEG Headband

  2021cited by this paper
• The value of doing nothing – How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks

  2021cited by this paper
• Exploring the spatial potential of neglected or unmanaged blue spaces in the city of Warsaw, Poland

  2021cited by this paper
• What’s biodiversity got to do with it? Perceptions of biodiversity and restorativeness in urban parks

  2021cited by this paper
• Freshwater systems and ecosystem services: Challenges and chances for cross-fertilization of disciplines

  2021cited by this paper
• The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits.

  2020cited by this paper
• Development of Areas by the Vistula River in Warsaw in the Context of Flood Issues as an Example of Adaptation to Climate Change

  2020cited by this paper
• Benefits of the ecosystem services provided by urban green infrastructures: Differences between perception and measurements

  2020cited by this paper
• Ecosystem services appreciation of urban lakes in Romania. Synergies and trade-offs between multiple users

  2019cited by this paper
• Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices

  2019cited by this paper
• Urban gardening and the quest for just uses of space in Europe

  2019cited by this paper
• Stakeholder perceptions of the ecosystem services provided by Green Infrastructure in New York City

  2019cited by this paper
• Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe

  2019cited by this paper
• Enabling Green and Blue Infrastructure to Improve Contributions to Human Well-Being and Equity in Urban Systems

  2019cited by this paper
• City wastelands: creating places of vernacular democracy

  2019cited by this paper
• Stewardship of urban ecosystem services : understanding the value(s) of urban gardens in Barcelona

  2018cited by this paper
• Mapping ecosystem services on brownfields in Leipzig, Germany

  2018cited by this paper
• Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?

  2017cited by this paper
• Marine wildlife as an important component of coastal visits: The role of perceived biodiversity and species behaviour

  2017cited by this paper
• BlueHealth: a study programme protocol for mapping and quantifying the potential benefits to public health and well-being from Europe’s blue spaces

  2017cited by this paper
• Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach

  2017cited by this paper
• heatmaply: an R package for creating interactive cluster heatmaps for online publishing

  2017cited by this paper
• Effects of biodiversity and environment-related attitude on perception of urban green space

  2017cited by this paper
• Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity.

  2017cited by this paper
• Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use

  2017cited by this paper
• Bottom-up thinking—Identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue–green infrastructure planning in Helsinki, Finland

  2016cited by this paper
• Editorial: Shared, plural and cultural values

  2016cited by this paper
• Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation

  2015cited by this paper
• ‘It's real, not fake like a park’: Residents’ perception and use of informal urban green-space in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan

  2015cited by this paper
• Perception and knowledge of plant diversity among urban park users

  2015cited by this paper
• Reflections about blue ecosystem services in cities

  2015cited by this paper
• The impact of small-scale design interventions on the behaviour patterns of the users of an urban wasteland

  2014cited by this paper
• Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment.

  2014cited by this paper
• Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences

  2012cited by this paper
• Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents

  2012cited by this paper
• The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics

  2010cited by this paper
• Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults.

  2007cited by this paper
• A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors

  2007cited by this paper
• Natur-Park Südgelände: linking conservation and recreation in an abandoned railyard in Berlin.

  2005cited by this paper
• Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis

  1952cited by this paper
• Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena.

  1950cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.