Variance of gravitational-wave populations

We quantify the impact of finite catalog size, or"catalog variance,"on current gravitational-wave population analyses. The distribution of merging binary black holes is commonly reconstructed via hierarchical Bayesian inference, with uncertainties reported as credible intervals. Such intervals are conditioned on the specific realization of the observed events and are therefore themselves subject to variability arising from the finite size of the catalog. We estimate this"uncertainty on the uncertainty"using statistical bootstrapping applied to data segments containing both detected events and sensitivity injections. Applying this framework to GWTC-4, we find that the inferred population distributions exhibit substantially broader uncertainties than those obtained in a standard single-catalog analysis. In particular, the $\sim 35\,M_\odot$ peak in the primary-mass distribution is largely absorbed by statistical fluctuations once catalog variance is taken into account. Unlike other studies that rely on simulating catalogs by assuming an underlying population, this work provides the first data-driven assessment of the uncertainty intrinsic to the observed gravitational-wave catalog. Accounting for catalog variance is important for drawing robust astrophysical conclusions from gravitational-wave data, avoiding inferences driven by a particular finite realization rather than genuine population features.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2026-02-27

• Fields of study

  Physics

• Identifiers
  arXiv 2603.00239
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• arXiv

  2019cited by this paper
• Statistics, Data Mining, and Machine Learning in Astronomy

  2019cited by this paper
• An Introduction to the Bootstrap

  2007cited by this paper
• Bootstrap Methods and Their Application

  1998cited by this paper
• Matter

  1995cited by this paper
• [Jackknife and bootstrap].

  1992cited by this paper
• The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans

  1987cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.