When accessibility distinctions matter or don't: Divergent patterns of offline and online cataphora resolution.

This study investigates how cataphoric pronouns are resolved in Korean, offering new insights into the cognitive mechanisms behind referential interpretation. Using both offline (questionnaire) and online (eye-tracking) methods, we examine whether mental accessibility-based constraints consistently influence pronoun resolution across processing modes. Offline results align with Accessibility Theory (Ariel, 2001): while both null (pro) and overt pronouns show a subject antecedent preference, the bias is stronger for pro, and overt pronouns display more flexibility toward object antecedents. However, the eye-tracking data reveal a different pattern: sentences were read more quickly when the context supported a subject antecedent interpretation-regardless of pronoun type-indicating a generalized subject bias during real-time processing. Notably, the two pronoun types did not differ in the strength of this bias during online comprehension. These findings support an active search mechanism for antecedents in real-time processing but also reveal a dissociation between online and offline resolution strategies. Overall, the results indicate that accessibility distinctions guide pronoun resolution in offline interpretation, but play a more limited role during rapid online comprehension in cataphoric dependencies, where they may conflict with strong processing heuristics. By highlighting this cross-task divergence, our findings suggest that mental accessibility constraints may be interpreted differently-or weighted unequally-across processing domains.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Acta Psychologica

• Publication date

  2026-03-04

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Linguistics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106424PMID 41785567
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Principle B is an early, predictive filter on active cataphor resolution: Eye-tracking evidence.

  2026cited by this paper
• Overgeneralization of Korean subject honorification by English-speaking learners of Korean

  2025cited by this paper
• When grammaticality is intentionally violated: Inanimate honorification as a politeness strategy

  2024cited by this paper
• Anticipatory processing of cataphora is constrained by binding principles in L2 English

  2024cited by this paper
• Processing cataphoric they amidst pronominal innovation

  2024cited by this paper
• When social hierarchy matters grammatically: Investigation of the processing of honorifics in Korean.

  2024cited by this paper
• Abstract prediction of morphosyntactic features: Evidence from processing cataphors in Dutch

  2023cited by this paper
• Honorific mismatches of coordinate subjects in Korean

  2023cited by this paper
• How Does Topicality Affect the Choice of Referential Form? Evidence From Mandarin

  2022cited by this paper
• Microvariation in the division of labor between null- and overt-subject pronouns: the case of Italian and Spanish

  2021cited by this paper
• Processing cataphors: Active antecedent search is persistent

  2021cited by this paper
• The interpretational preferences of null and overt pronouns in Chinese

  2021cited by this paper
• Interpretation of Korean Null Pronouns in subject and object position: Comparing native and non-native speakers

  2021cited by this paper
• Principle B constrains the processing of cataphora: Evidence for syntactic and discourse predictions

  2020cited by this paper
• Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean

  2019cited by this paper
• Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution

  2018cited by this paper
• Cataphoric pronoun resolution in native and non-native sentence comprehension

  2018cited by this paper
• lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models

  2017cited by this paper
• Co-referential Processing of Pronouns and Repeated Names in Italian

  2017cited by this paper
• Attraction Effects in Honorific Agreement in Korean

  2016cited by this paper
• Grammatical and pragmatic factors in the interpretation of Japanese null and overt pronouns

  2016cited by this paper
• Centering Theory In Discourse

  2016cited by this paper
• Pronoun ambiguity resolution in Greek: Evidence from monolingual adults and children

  2015cited by this paper
• Active search for antecedents in cataphoric pronoun resolution

  2015cited by this paper
• Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.

  2015cited by this paper
• The time course of long-distance anaphor processing in Korean

  2015cited by this paper
• The use of control information in dependency formation: An eye-tracking study

  2014cited by this paper
• Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: a cross-linguistic comparison

  2014cited by this paper
• Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

  2014cited by this paper
• A probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun interpretation

  2013cited by this paper
• Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

  2013cited by this paper
• The Acquisition of the Korean Honorific Affix (u)si by Advanced L2 Learners

  2013cited by this paper
• Null pronominal (pro) resolution in Korean, a discourse-oriented language

  2013cited by this paper
• WHO WAS WALKING ON THE BEACH?

  2011cited by this paper
• Processing Null and Overt Pronoun Subject in Ambiguous Sentences in Korean

  2011cited by this paper
• Repeated names, overt pronouns, and null pronouns in Spanish

  2011cited by this paper
• Pronouns in Catalan: Games of Partial Information and the Use of Linguistic Resources.

  2010cited by this paper
• How Speakers Refer: The Role of Accessibility

  2010cited by this paper
• Differential effects of constraints in the processing of Russian cataphora

  2010cited by this paper
• Processing Differences for Anaphoric and Cataphoric Pronouns: Implications for Theories of Discourse Processing

  2009cited by this paper
• Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.

  2008cited by this paper
• Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

  2008cited by this paper
• Processing Pronouns without Antecedents: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials

  2008cited by this paper
• Korean honorification: a kind of expressive meaning

  2007cited by this paper
• Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery.

  2007cited by this paper
• The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora

  2007cited by this paper
• ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.

  2005cited by this paper
• The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment.

  2003cited by this paper
• Accessibility theory: An overview

  2001cited by this paper
• Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

  1998cited by this paper
• Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse

  1995cited by this paper
• Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies

  1993cited by this paper
• The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar

  1991cited by this paper
• Referring and accessibility

  1988cited by this paper
• Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction

  1983cited by this paper
• Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view

  1976cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.