Open letter to the European commission: scientifically unfounded precaution drives European commission’s recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science, and risk assessment principles

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Archives of Toxicology

• Publication date

  2013-08-27

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1117-2PMID 23979651
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Scientific Opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors: Scientific criteria for identification of endocrine disruptors and appropriateness of existing test methods for assessing effects mediated by these substances on human health and the environment

  2013cited by this paper
• When environmental chemicals act like uncontrolled medicine.

  2013cited by this paper
• Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

  2012cited by this paper
• The human relevant potency threshold: reducing uncertainty by human calibration of cumulative risk assessments.

  2012cited by this paper
• Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose-responses of endocrine disrupting chemicals: has the case been made?

  2012influential reference
• Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society.

  2012cited by this paper
• Minireview: NAD+, a circadian metabolite with an epigenetic twist.

  2012cited by this paper
• Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer health effects is the exception, not the rule

  2011influential reference
• Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity

  2011cited by this paper
• Application of Key Events Analysis to Chemical Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens

  2009influential reference
• No-threshold dose-response curves for nongenotoxic chemicals: findings and applications for risk assessment.

  2006cited by this paper

• Legal Recognition of Electronic Personhood and Administrative Liability for its Activity

  2025cites this paper
• Robotics and AI into healthcare from the perspective of European regulation: who is responsible for medical malpractice?

  2024cites this paper
• Endocrine-active and endocrine-disrupting compounds in food – occurrence, formation and relevance

  2023cites this paper
• Integrative Robo-Ethics: Uncovering Roboticists’ Attitudes to Ethics and Moving Forward

  2023cites this paper
• Evaluation of microbial contamination in cold dishes and Prevalence of food-borne pathogens in the Jilin Province.

  2022cites this paper
• Governing through Controversy: The Challenge of New Toxicological Methodologies

  2022cites this paper
• An Article on Green Firefighting Equipment in Taiwan

  2021cites this paper
• Factors Affecting the Perception of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in the Ecotoxicology Community

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

  2020cites this paper
• Sequential cumulation of copyright with protection of products of industrial design.

  2019cites this paper
• Endocrine disrupting chemicals: Impact on human health, wildlife and the environment

  2019cites this paper
• IAFSS agenda 2030 for a fire safe world

  2019cites this paper
• The inadequacies of pre‐market chemical risk assessment's toxicity studies—the implications

  2017cites this paper
• Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than ‘sound science’, should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals

  2016cites this paper
• Methodological issues in human studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals

  2015cites this paper
• Méthodes quantitatives pour évaluer les risques non mutagènes des substances chimiques : Application au cas du chlordécone

  2015cites this paper
• Infant toxicology: state of the science and considerations in evaluation of safety.

  2014cites this paper
• Risk assessment's insensitive toxicity testing may cause it to fail.

  2014cites this paper
• A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals

  2014cites this paper
• Information behaviors at the edge of reason: The role of uncertainty, science, and culture on environmental policy

  2014influential citation
• Alternative Approaches to Dose–Response Modeling of Toxicological Endpoints for Risk Assessment: Nonmonotonic Dose Responses for Endocrine Disruptors

  2014cites this paper
• Journal editors trade blows over toxicology

  2013cites this paper
• Progress in understanding endocrine disruption requires cross-disciplinary approaches and concepts

  2013cites this paper
• Scientific journals' responsibility in shaping public health policy

  2013cites this paper
• Editorial: an international Riposte to Naysayers of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

  2013cites this paper