Utility of Reporting the Percentage of High-grade Prostate Cancer.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  European Urology

• Publication date

  2016-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.008PMID 26607687
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.

  2016cited by this paper
• The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System

  2015cited by this paper
• Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score Correlation in Heterogenous Tumors: Proposal for a Composite Gleason Score

  2015cited by this paper
• Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations.

  2015cited by this paper
• The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists

  2014cited by this paper
• Overall and worst gleason scores are equally good predictors of prostate cancer progression

  2011cited by this paper
• Interobserver reproducibility of percent Gleason grade 4/5 in prostate biopsies.

  2004cited by this paper
• Percent Gleason grade (4/5) as prognostic factor in prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection.

  2002cited by this paper
• Percent Gleason grade 4/5 as prognostic factor in prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection.

  2002cited by this paper
• Interobserver reproducibility of percent Gleason grade 4/5 in total prostatectomy specimens.

  2002cited by this paper
• Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer.

  1999cited by this paper
• Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostate

  1990influential reference

• Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review

  2021cites this paper
• The percentage of high‐grade prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies significantly improves on Grade Groups in the prediction of prostate cancer death

  2019cites this paper
• Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in core needle biopsy and transurethral resection and enucleation specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

  2019cites this paper
• Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system

  2018cites this paper
• [Pathological assessment of prostate cancer. New problems].

  2018cites this paper
• Prostate Core Needle Biopsy Histopathology Reporting Guide Part 2-Case Level Reporting

  2018cites this paper
• Prostate Core Needle Biopsy Histopathology Reporting Guide Part 2-Specimen Level Reporting

  2018cites this paper
• Histopathology of Prostate Cancer.

  2017cites this paper
• Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians

  2017cites this paper
• Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma

  2017cites this paper
• From Gleason Grading System and High-grade Tertiary Patterns to Grade Groups and Integrated Quantitative Gleason Score.

  2017cites this paper
• Prostate cancer glands with cribriform architecture and with glomeruloid features should be considered as Gleason pattern 4 and not pattern 3.

  2016cites this paper
• Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping

  2016cites this paper
• Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy

  2016cites this paper
• Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies

  2016cites this paper