Reality bites--A ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Forensic Science International

• Publication date

  2012-03-10

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.08.023PMID 21930355
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A paradigm shift in the analysis of bitemarks.

  2010cited by this paper
• Is current bite mark analysis a misnomer?

  2010cited by this paper
• Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward

  2009cited by this paper
• Expert Disagreement in Bitemark Casework *

  2009cited by this paper
• Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions

  2009cited by this paper
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

  2008cited by this paper
• Forensics under fire

  2008cited by this paper
• Reality Bites: The Illusion of Science in Bite-Mark Evidence

  2008cited by this paper
• Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How it Might Yet Find it

  2008cited by this paper
• ‘Good’ Science Gone Bad: How the Criminal Justice System Can Redress the Impact of Flawed Forensics

  2008cited by this paper
• Development and Validation of a Human Bitemark Severity and Significance Scale

  2007cited by this paper
• Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure

  2006cited by this paper
• The "Science" of Wrongful Convictions

  2003cited by this paper
• Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.

  2002cited by this paper
• Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.

  1999cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a bitemark using clear acrylic replicas of the suspect's dentition--a case report.

  1999cited by this paper
• About face

  1998cited by this paper
• Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.

  1998cited by this paper

• A mathematical model for scientifically defining the class characteristics of the human anterior maxilla—Part 1: The dental arch

  2025cites this paper
• Bite marks: To opine or not to opine?

  2024cites this paper
• Human bite mark analysis: Review of advantage computer-assisted procedure

  2022cites this paper
• Forensic Dental Evidence in a case of sexual assault and homicide of a minor girl in India: A Case Report

  2020cites this paper
• Dental age estimation of Malaysian Chinese children and adolescents: Chaillet and Demirjian’s method revisited using artificial multilayer perceptron neural network

  2020cites this paper
• Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts

  2017cites this paper
• Benchmarking forensic rulers and photographic techniques.

  2016cites this paper
• 8. Bite marks

  2016cites this paper
• Identification of Suspect by Bite Mark Analysis in a Dead Woman: A Case Report

  2016cites this paper
• The Role of Forensic Dentistry for Identification of a Criminal Sexual Assault: A Casework Report

  2015cites this paper
• Forensic Odontology in Digital Era

  2015cites this paper
• Envelopment technique and topographic overlays in bite mark analysis

  2015cites this paper
• The identification of human skeletal remains by frontal sinus morphology using three dimensional data obtained from computed tomography (CT scans)

  2015influential citation
• Diagnostic criteria for cutaneous injuries in child abuse: classification, findings, and interpretation

  2015cites this paper
• HUMAN'S DENTITION USE IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS

  2014cites this paper
• Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?

  2014cites this paper
• Authors' Response

  2013cites this paper
• Expert Interpretation of Bitemark Injuries—A Contemporary Qualitative Study

  2013cites this paper
• Analysis and identification of bite marks in forensic casework.

  2013cites this paper
• The Most Common Types of Bias in a Human Bitemark Analysis

  year unknowncites this paper