A method for measuring external spinal loads during unconstrained free-dynamic lifting.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1997

• Venue

  Journal of Biomechanics

• Publication date

  1997-09-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00055-9PMID 9302623
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Validation of two 3-D segment models to calculate the net reaction forces and moments at the L(5)/S(1) joint in lifting.

  1996cited by this paper
• A method for measuring external loads during dynamic lifting exertions.

  1996cited by this paper
• An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.

  1995cited by this paper
• Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities.

  1994cited by this paper
• Pivoting with the load. An alternative for protecting the back in asymmetrical lifting.

  1993cited by this paper
• Inertial effects from single body segments in dynamic analysis of lifting.

  1991cited by this paper
• 1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting

  1986cited by this paper

• Spine loading during the application and removal of lifting slings: the effects of patient weight, bed height and work method

  2017cites this paper
• Assessing the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLV): lifting beyond 30 degrees torso asymmetry

  2016cites this paper
• MEASURING BIOMECHANICAL LOADS ON THE SPINE DURING PATIENT LIFTING SLING APPLICATION AND REMOVAL : ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF WORK METHOD , PATIENT WEIGHT AND BED HEIGHT THESIS

  2015cites this paper
• Weight knowledge and weight magnitude: impact on lumbosacral loading

  2015cites this paper
• A Novel Electromyography Simulator Based on Experiment Data

  2014cites this paper
• Carrying and spine loading

  2013cites this paper
• An EMG-assisted model calibration technique that does not require MVCs.

  2013cites this paper
• Association between spinal loads and the psychophysical determination of maximum acceptable force during pushing tasks

  2012cites this paper
• Musculoskeletal disorder risk during automotive assembly: current vs. seated.

  2012cites this paper
• Calibrating an EMG-assisted Biomechanical Model of the Lumbar Spine without Maximum Voluntary Contractions

  2012cites this paper
• Immune Responses to Low Back Pain Risk Factors

  2012cites this paper
• The biochemical response to biomechanical tissue loading on the low back during physical work exposure.

  2011cites this paper
• Spinal Loading and Immune Responses to Personality and Mental Load During Repetitive Lifting

  2011cites this paper
• Musculoskeletal disorder risk as a function of vehicle rotation angle during assembly tasks.

  2011cites this paper
• Development and validation of a fatigue-modified , EMG-assisted biomechanical model of the lumbar region

  2011cites this paper
• Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices

  2009cites this paper
• Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.

  2009cites this paper
• Rescuer's position and energy consumption, spinal kinetics, and effectiveness of simulated cardiac compression.

  2008cites this paper
• Comparing the results of five lifting analysis tools.

  2007cites this paper
• Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.

  2006cites this paper
• A fuzzy relational rule network modeling of electromyographical activity of trunk muscles in manual lifting based on trunk angels, moments, pelvic tilt and rotation angles

  2006cites this paper
• Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.

  2006cites this paper
• Baggage handling in an airplane cargo hold: An ergonomic intervention study

  2006cites this paper
• Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.

  2005influential citation
• Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response?

  2005cites this paper
• Functional Impairment as a Predictor of Spine Loading

  2005cites this paper
• Spine loading in patients with low back pain during asymmetric lifting exertions.

  2004cites this paper
• Partitioning the contributing role of biomechanical, psychosocial, and individual risk factors in the development of spine loads.

  2003cites this paper
• Low back pain and lifting: A review of epidemiology and aetiology

  2003cites this paper
• Gender influences on spine loads during complex lifting.

  2003cites this paper
• The Impact of Mental Processing and Pacing on Spine Loading: 2002 Volvo Award in Biomechanics

  2002cites this paper
• Relative Contribution of Workplace Factors and Individual Characteristics in the Development of Spine Loads

  2002cites this paper
• The Effect of a Variable Lumbar Erector Spinae Sagittal Plane Moment Arm on Predicted Spinal Loading

  2002cites this paper
• Spine Loading as a Function of Gender

  2002cites this paper
• Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task

  2002cites this paper
• Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins

  2002cites this paper
• An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift

  2001cites this paper
• Spine Loading Characteristics of Patients With Low Back Pain Compared With Asymptomatic Individuals

  2001cites this paper
• EŒect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions

  2001cites this paper
• Signi ® cance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift

  2001cites this paper
• EŒects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting

  2001cites this paper
• Quantification and modeling of the lumbar erector spinae as a function of sagittal plane torso flexion

  2001cites this paper
• A Comparison of Males and Females during Asymmetric Lifting

  2000cites this paper
• Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability.

  2000cites this paper
• An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift

  2000cites this paper
• Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions

  2000cites this paper
• Influence of Job Stress on Muscle Activity and Spinal Loads

  2000cites this paper
• Assessment of the Relationship between Box Weight and Trunk Kinematics: Does a Reduction in Box Weight Necessarily Correspond to a Decrease in Spinal Loading?

  2000cites this paper
• The Influence of Psychosocial Stress, Gender, and Personality on Mechanical Loading of the Lumbar Spine

  2000cites this paper
• Combined Spinal Motion and Loading in Occupational Low Back Disorders

  2000cites this paper
• Variability in spine loading model performance q

  1999cites this paper
• Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting.

  1999cites this paper
• A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques.

  1999cites this paper
• Variability in spine loading model performance.

  1999cites this paper
• Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting.

  1999cites this paper
• Benefits of Trunk Muscle Co-Contraction in Protecting against Low-Back Injury during Manual Materials Lifting

  1999cites this paper
• Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.

  1999cites this paper
• Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions.

  1999cites this paper
• Regression Models for Predicting Peak and Continuous Three-Dimensional Spinal Loads during Symmetric and Asymmetric Lifting Tasks

  1999cites this paper
• Is Changing Box Weight an Effective Ergonomic Control?

  1998cites this paper
• Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles.

  1998cites this paper
• An Assessment of Complex Spinal Loads During Dynamic Lifting Tasks

  1998cites this paper
• Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.

  1998cites this paper
• Low Back Disorder Risk and Spinal Loading during Patient Transfer

  1998cites this paper