Abstract Hadoop is currently the large-scale data analysis “hammer” of choice, but there exist classes of algorithms that aren't “nails” in the sense that they are not particularly amenable to the MapReduce programming model. To address this, researchers have proposed MapReduce extensions or alternative programming models in which these algorithms can be elegantly expressed. This article espouses a very different position: that MapReduce is “good enough,” and that instead of trying to invent screwdrivers, we should simply get rid of everything that's not a nail. To be more specific, much discussion in the literature surrounds the fact that iterative algorithms are a poor fit for MapReduce. The simple solution is to find alternative, noniterative algorithms that solve the same problem. This article captures my personal experiences as an academic researcher as well as a software engineer in a “real-world” production analytics environment. From this combined perspective, I reflect on the current state and future of “big data” research.
Mapreduce is Good Enough?If All You Have is a Hammer, Throw Away Everything That's Not a Nail!
Published 2012 in Big Data
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2012
- Venue
Big Data
- Publication date
2012-09-10
- Fields of study
Medicine, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-57 of 57 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-99 of 99 citing papers · Page 1 of 1