Effects of response–stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2006

• Venue

  Memory

• Publication date

  2006-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/09658210601008973PMID 17077031
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• On the role of verbalization during task set selection: Switching or serial order control?

  2005influential reference
• The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition

  2005cited by this paper
• THE ROLE OF THE PHONOLOGICAL LOOP IN TASK SWITCHING PERFORMANCE: THE EFFECT OF ARTICULATORY SUPPRESSION IN THE ALTERNATING RUNS PARADIGM

  2004cited by this paper
• Effect of articulatory suppression on task‐switching performance: Implications for models of working memory

  2004cited by this paper
• Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.

  2004influential reference
• Age differences in executive functioning across the lifespan: the role of verbalization in task preparation.

  2004cited by this paper
• The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation

  2003influential reference
• The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching

  2003cited by this paper
• Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches

  2003cited by this paper
• An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall

  2002cited by this paper
• Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration

  2002cited by this paper
• Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.

  2001influential reference
• Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching.

  2001cited by this paper
• Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching.

  2001influential reference
• Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching

  2000influential reference
• Component processes in task switching.

  2000cited by this paper
• Oscillator-based memory for serial order.

  2000cited by this paper
• Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.

  2000cited by this paper
• Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing

  1999cited by this paper
• Short-term memory for serial order: the Start-End Model.

  1998cited by this paper
• The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall.

  1998cited by this paper
• Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.

  1996influential reference
• Exploring the Central Executive

  1996cited by this paper
• Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.

  1995influential reference
• Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition

  1990cited by this paper
• Working memory

  1984influential reference
• The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method

  1969cited by this paper
• THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54A (3), 785–803 A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch

  year unknowncited by this paper

• An Emergentist Account of Language in the Brain - Seeking Neural Synergies Behind Human Uniqueness

  2025cites this paper
• Cognitive costs in motor-cognitive performance assessments depend on movement complexity and cognitive task design

  2025cites this paper
• Entraînement de la mémoire de travail dans l’autisme: Transfert proche et éloigné

  2023cites this paper
• Verbal interference paradigms: A systematic review investigating the role of language in cognition

  2022cites this paper
• The Effectiveness of Training in Task Switching

  2019cites this paper
• Attention Deficits in Stroke Patients: The Role of Lesion Characteristics, Time from Stroke, and Concomitant Neuropsychological Deficits

  2019cites this paper
• Improving the Competence of Diagrammatic and Argumentative Representation in Physics through Android-based Mobile Learning Application

  2018cites this paper
• A Working Memory System With Distributed Executive Control

  2016cites this paper
• Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance?

  2013cites this paper
• The Effect of Articulatory Suppression Behaviors on the Performance of Working Memory System

  2013cites this paper
• The role of verbal cues in task-goal maintenance

  2013influential citation
• Breaking a habit: A further role of the phonological loop in action control

  2013cites this paper
• Differential effects of articulatory suppression on cue-switch and task-switch trials in random task cueing with 2:1 mapping

  2012cites this paper
• The influence of articulatory suppression on the control of implicit sequence knowledge

  2012cites this paper
• The impact of verbal instructions on goal-directed behaviour.

  2012cites this paper
• Inner Speech and Task Switching in Adults

  2012cites this paper
• Role of Working Memory in Task Switching

  2012cites this paper
• Inner speech helps participants to stop an action: the effects of Articulatory suppression in a goal neglect task

  2011cites this paper
• Task switching and serial memory: looking into the nature of switches and tasks.

  2011cites this paper
• Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control.

  2010cites this paper
• The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: evidence from a dual task paradigm.

  2010cites this paper
• Articulatory Suppression in Immediate Serial Recall: Does Overt Suppression Suppress Subvocal Rehearsal?

  2010cites this paper
• Verbal representation in task order control: An examination with transition and task cues in random task switching

  2009cites this paper
• PHONOLOGICAL LOOP AND GOAL MAINTENANCE: EFFECT OF ARTICULATORY SUPPRESSION IN NUMBER-SIZE CONSISTENCY TASK

  2007cites this paper