Constructive Interaction: An Analysis of Verbal Interaction in a Usability Setting

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2006

• Venue

  IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

• Publication date

  2006-11-30

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1109/TPC.2006.885865
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Thinking about thinking aloud: a comparison of two verbal protocols for usability testing

  2004cited by this paper
• ‘Extreme communicative acts’ and the boosting of illocutionary force

  2004cited by this paper
• Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: a methodological comparison

  2004influential reference
• Using peer tutoring in evaluating the usability of a physically interactive computer game with children

  2003cited by this paper
• Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks

  2003cited by this paper
• Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation

  2003cited by this paper
• Constructive Interactions

  2003cited by this paper
• Les tests utilisateurs: avantages et inconvénients des passations individuelles et par paires

  2002cited by this paper
• Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication

  2002cited by this paper
• Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice

  2000cited by this paper
• Methods & tools: constructive interaction and collaborative work

  2000cited by this paper
• From usability lab to “design collaboratorium”: reframing usability practice

  2000cited by this paper
• Evaluating the usability of an evolving collaborative product —changes in user type, tasks and evaluation methods over time

  1999cited by this paper
• Replacing usability testing with user dialogue

  1999cited by this paper
• Thinking Aloud Together: A Test of an Intervention to Foster Students' Collaborative Scientific Reasoning

  1999cited by this paper
• Getting the most from paired-user testing

  1995cited by this paper
• Politeness: some universals in language usage

  1995cited by this paper
• Conversation analysis and human-computer interaction design

  1995cited by this paper
• Model-based communicative acts: human-computer collaboration in supervisory control

  1994cited by this paper
• The pluralistic usability walkthrough: coordinated empathies

  1994cited by this paper
• On the role of the PC as a relevant object in face-to-face communication

  1994cited by this paper
• A Practical Guide to Usability Testing

  1993cited by this paper
• Team Usability Testing: Are two Heads Better than One?

  1992influential reference
• Using video in the BNR usability lab

  1989cited by this paper
• Politeness: some universals in language usage

  1987cited by this paper
• ON THE ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION

  1978cited by this paper

• Older Adults' Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud Verbalizations for Identifying User Experience Problems of VR Games

  2022cites this paper
• USABILITY AND USER EXPERIENCE: DESIGN AND EVALUATION

  2021cites this paper
• Comparing Two Methods of Usability Testing in Saudi Arabia: Concurrent Think-Aloud vs. Co-Discovery

  2021cites this paper
• The Impact of Thinking-Aloud on Usability Inspection

  2020cites this paper
• Improving Usability with Think Aloud and Focus Group Methods. A Case Study: An Intelligent Police Patrolling System (I-Pat)

  2019cites this paper
• ServiceDesignKIT: A Web Platform of Digital Service Design Techniques

  2018cites this paper
• Revising the Online Classroom: Usability Testing for Training Online Technical Communication Instructors

  2017cites this paper
• What Do Thinking-Aloud Participants Say? A Comparison of Moderated and Unmoderated Usability Sessions

  2015influential citation
• Mobiililaitteella käytettävän CRM-sovelluksen käytettävyystestauksen suunnittelu ja testaus

  2014cites this paper
• The impact of two different think-aloud instructions in a usability test: a case of just following orders?

  2014cites this paper
• New Options for Usability Testing Projects in Business Communication Courses

  2013cites this paper
• Dual Verbal Elicitation: The Complementary Use of Concurrent and Retrospective Reporting Within a Usability Test

  2013cites this paper
• A Comparison of two concurrent think-aloud protocols: Categories and relevancy of utterances

  2012cites this paper
• Combining Concurrent Think-Aloud Protocols and Eye-Tracking Observations: An Analysis of Verbalizations and Silences

  2012cites this paper
• Exploring Think-Alouds in Usability Testing: An International Survey

  2012cites this paper
• Evaluating website quality: Five studies on user-focused evaluation methods

  2012cites this paper
• The contextual evaluation framework : a prototype evaluation technique for e-Research

  2011cites this paper
• Keep talking: an analysis of participant utterances gathered using two concurrent think-aloud methods

  2010cites this paper
• Assessing Concurrent Think-Aloud Protocol as a Usability Test Method: A Technical Communication Approach

  2010cites this paper
• A penny for your thoughts. Investigating the validity and reliability of think-aloud protocols for usability testing

  2008cites this paper
• 13 Decision-Making in a Collaborative Writing Task

  2007cites this paper