Workshop proceedings: managing conflict of interest in science. A little consensus and a lot of controversy.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Toxicological Sciences

• Publication date

  2005-09-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, History

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/TOXSCI/KFI240PMID 15976187
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials

  2007cited by this paper
• Conflicts of Interest: Owens’ Response

  2004cited by this paper
• Editorial: Embracing Scrutiny

  2004cited by this paper
• Conflicts of Interest: Gulson’s Response

  2004cited by this paper
• Conflicts of Interest: Ayotte’s Response

  2004cited by this paper
• Conflicts of Interest: Blumberg’s Response

  2004cited by this paper
• Study on Failures to Disclose Conflicts of Interest in Environmental Health Perspectives

  2004cited by this paper
• Unrevealed: Non-Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest In Four Leading Medical and Scientific Journals

  2004cited by this paper
• Guidelines governing conflict of interest.

  2003cited by this paper
• Conflict of interest.

  2002cited by this paper
• The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science

  2002cited by this paper
• Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures

  2001influential reference
• How expectancies shape experience.

  1999cited by this paper
• Beyond conflict of interest

  1999cited by this paper
• Toxicology: judge data or dollars?

  1999cited by this paper
• Beyond conflict of interest. Transparency is the key.

  1998cited by this paper
• Competing interests: The need to control conflict of interests in biomedical research

  1996cited by this paper
• Conflict of interest. The new McCarthyism in science.

  1993cited by this paper
• Ethical issues in funding and monitoring university research.

  1992cited by this paper
• The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.

  1992cited by this paper
• Fraudulent statistical methods.

  1991cited by this paper
• Fraudulent statistical methods.

  1991cited by this paper
• The ethics of research sponsorship.

  1991cited by this paper
• Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials

  1986cited by this paper

• Ethical considerations.

  2020cites this paper
• Ethical considerations

  2020cites this paper
• Toward Transparent Reporting of Psychological Science

  2017cites this paper
• Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals

  2017cites this paper
• Ethics: Ethical Issues in Toxicology

  2014cites this paper
• Conflict of Interest Policies at Canadian Universities and Medical Schools: Some Lessons from the AMSA PharmFree Scorecard

  2012cites this paper
• Occupational Exposure Guidelines – Why Process Is as Important as Science

  2011cites this paper
• Classical Breeding in Diatoms: Scientific Background and Practical Perspectives

  2011cites this paper
• ICCVAM: Birnbaum and Stokes Respond

  2010cites this paper
• Conflicts of Interest and Medical Publishing: The Private Eye Test

  2010cites this paper
• Good Laboratory Practices: Becker et al. Respond

  2010cites this paper
• Raising the standard: a response to the commentators.

  2009cites this paper
• Basic Elements of Toxicology

  2009cites this paper
• Chapter 29 – Ethical Considerations

  2009cites this paper
• Ethical, Legal, Social and Professional Issues in Toxicology

  2009cites this paper
• A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists

  2007cites this paper
• Bias in toxicology

  2007influential citation
• What influences a health risk assessment?

  2006cites this paper
• He who pays the piper, calls the tune.....

  2006cites this paper