Pencina et al. respond to "The incremental value of new markers" and "Clinically relevant measures? A note of caution".

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  American Journal of Epidemiology

• Publication date

  2012-09-15

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/AJE/KWS206PMID 22875757PMCID PMC3530352
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.

  2012cited by this paper
• Further insight into the incremental value of new markers: the interpretation of performance measures and the importance of clinical context.

  2012influential reference
• Clinically relevant measures of fit? A note of caution.

  2012cited by this paper
• Multivariate Analysis

  1998cited by this paper
• On the Performance of the Linear Discriminant Function

  1964cited by this paper

• Association Between High‐Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and Cardiac Events in Elderly Women

  2017cites this paper
• Simpson's paradox in the integrated discrimination improvement

  2017cites this paper
• CVD-predictive performances of “a body shape index” versus simple anthropometric measures: Tehran lipid and glucose study

  2016cites this paper
• Quantifying the value of biomarkers for predicting mortality.

  2015cites this paper
• Clinical utility in evaluation of risk models.

  2012cites this paper