AutoDunt: Dynamic Latent Dependence Analysis for Detection of Zero Day Vulnerability

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology

• Publication date

  2011-11-30

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31912-9_10
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• AEG: Automatic Exploit Generation

  2011cited by this paper
• NoTamper: automatic blackbox detection of parameter tampering opportunities in web applications

  2010cited by this paper
• Taint-based directed whitebox fuzzing

  2009cited by this paper
• Return-Oriented Rootkits: Bypassing Kernel Code Integrity Protection Mechanisms

  2009cited by this paper
• Memsherlock: an automated debugger for unknown memory corruption vulnerabilities

  2007cited by this paper
• Creating Vulnerability Signatures Using Weakest Preconditions

  2007cited by this paper
• Panorama: capturing system-wide information flow for malware detection and analysis

  2007cited by this paper
• Practical taint-based protection using demand emulation

  2006cited by this paper
• TTAnalyze: A Tool for Analyzing Malware

  2006cited by this paper
• LIFT: A Low-Overhead Practical Information Flow Tracking System for Detecting Security Attacks

  2006cited by this paper
• SigFree: A Signature-Free Buffer Overflow Attack Blocker

  2006cited by this paper
• Towards automatic generation of vulnerability-based signatures

  2006cited by this paper
• Securing software by enforcing data-flow integrity

  2006cited by this paper
• Address Space Layout Permutation (ASLP): Towards Fine-Grained Randomization of Commodity Software

  2006cited by this paper
• Hamsa: fast signature generation for zero-day polymorphic worms with provable attack resilience

  2006cited by this paper
• e-NeXSh: achieving an effectively non-executable stack and heap via system-call policing

  2005cited by this paper
• Detection and prevention of stack buffer overflow attacks

  2005cited by this paper
• Debugging Operating Systems with Time-Traveling Virtual Machines (Awarded General Track Best Paper Award!)

  2005cited by this paper
• SafeMem: exploiting ECC-memory for detecting memory leaks and memory corruption during production runs

  2005cited by this paper
• Polygraph: automatically generating signatures for polymorphic worms

  2005cited by this paper
• Efficient Techniques for Comprehensive Protection from Memory Error Exploits

  2005cited by this paper
• Dynamic Taint Analysis for Automatic Detection, Analysis, and SignatureGeneration of Exploits on Commodity Software

  2005cited by this paper
• Vigilante: end-to-end containment of internet worms

  2005cited by this paper
• QEMU, a Fast and Portable Dynamic Translator

  2005cited by this paper
• Side Effects Are Not Sufficient to Authenticate Software

  2004cited by this paper
• On the effectiveness of address-space randomization

  2004cited by this paper
• Secure program execution via dynamic information flow tracking

  2004cited by this paper
• A processor architecture defense against buffer overflow attacks

  2003cited by this paper
• Obfuscation of executable code to improve resistance to static disassembly

  2003cited by this paper
• Secure Execution via Program Shepherding

  2002cited by this paper
• Buffer overflows: attacks and defenses for the vulnerability of the decade

  2000cited by this paper
• Identifying loops in almost linear time

  1999cited by this paper
• A Taxonomy of Obfuscating Transformations

  1997cited by this paper
• Identifying loops using DJ graphs

  1996cited by this paper
• Programmers use slices when debugging

  1982cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.